ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2024
Experiences of primary eye care use among adults in Southern Ethiopia: A qualitative study.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary eye care (PEC) is an important component of comprehensive eye care services that allows communities to enjoy basic high-quality services. However, because of various determinants, communities do not use this service. Aim: This study aimed to explore and describe the experience of adults who used PEC services in the last 6 months. Setting: This study was carried out in four districts in southern Ethiopia from June to September 2023. Methods: An exploratory descriptive qualitative study design was used to understand the experiences of adults 40 years and older who had used PEC services. Six focus group discussions were conducted with a total of 48 participants. A nonprobability purposive sampling technique was used to draw participants. Data were analysed thematically using ATLAS.ti software version 23.2.2. Results: Primary eye care service use experiences of adults 40 years and above were discussed in terms of three emerging themes: the experience of community service use, barriers to service and suggestions to improve service. The study identified poor access to services, service provider-related factors and quality and awareness gaps as barriers to the use of PEC services. Conclusion: Attention to PEC services, integration of eye care with other primary health care services, deployment of service providers, awareness creation and expansion of PEC units are needed to improve PEC service use. Contribution: The findings will guide community-based intervention plans to reduce avoidable blindness and low vision, thus improving quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.