ReviewCureus2024
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation (EUS-RFA) for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Palliative Care.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still one of the deadliest neoplasms in the world. Although various advancements in the treatment and management of this disease have been made, no significant overall survival benefit has been achieved. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been proposed as a treatment for patients who are unfit for surgery or with inoperable PDAC. We conducted a literature review of the PubMed and Embase databases to identify and analyze studies on the use of EUS-RFA in inoperable PDAC. Eleven studies with a total of 122 patients were analyzed to assess the population characteristics, feasibility and safety of the procedure, and overall survival of the population. Technical success was achieved in 95.1% of cases, and no intraoperative complications were reported. The most common early complication reported was abdominal pain (21 out of 122 patients) with a total early complication rate of 29.6%, and none of these complications affected hospital stays or post-procedure recovery. Late complications were reported in four patients (3.2%). Post-procedure cytoreduction was achieved in all patients, although disease progression was reported in 119 of 122 patients. The overall survival rate did not differ from that reported in the literature. We found that EUS-RFA could be a valid palliative option for inoperable patients, a bridge for surgery reducing the size of the tumor and its vascular relationship, or a first-line therapy in a subset of selected patients. Larger cohort and prospective studies should be conducted to establish guidelines for this procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.