Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364112›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2024

Reliability of the 2018 Revised Version of AO/OTA Classification for Femoral Shaft Fractures.

Jung-Wee Park, Woo-Lam Jo, Byung Kyu Park, Jong Jin Go, Minji Han, Sungha Chun, Young-Kyun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jung-Wee ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-1895
Woo-Lam JoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7021-9348
Byung Kyu ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2441-1472
Jong Jin GoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4743-4434
Minji HanDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2634-3656
Sungha ChunDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0975-395X
Young-Kyun LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6564-4294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification system for diaphyseal fracture has been recently revised to refine and enhance the accuracy of fracture categorization. This study aimed to investigate the interobserver reliability of the new AO/OTA classification and to compare it with the older version in femoral shaft fractures. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 139 patients (mean age, 43.8 ± 19.5 years; 92 men and 47 women) with femoral shaft fractures who were treated from 2003 to 2017. Four well-trained observers independently classified each fracture following the previous and revised AO/OTA classification system. We calculated the Fleiss kappa for the interobserver reliability. Results: The previous classification showed the kappa value of 0.580 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.547-0.613), and the revised version showed 0.528 (95% CI, 0.504-0.552). Both the old and the revised versions showed moderate reliability. Conclusions: Our study highlights the moderate interobserver reliability of both the previous and new AO/OTA classification systems for diaphyseal femur fractures. These findings emphasize the importance of standardized systems in clinical decision-making and underscore the need for ongoing education and collaboration to enhance fracture classification.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiaphysesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultClassificationFemoral fractureInterobserver variabilityValidation study

Identifiers

PMID39364112
PMCPMC11444943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.