Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39364009›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2024

Methods for multi-omic data integration in cancer research.

Enrique Hernández-Lemus, Soledad Ochoa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Harnessing biomarkers to guide immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: toward precision oncology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enrique Hernández-LemusComputational Genomics Division, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City, Mexico.
Soledad OchoaComputational Genomics Division, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-omics data integration is a term that refers to the process of combining and analyzing data from different omic experimental sources, such as genomics, transcriptomics, methylation assays, and microRNA sequencing, among others. Such data integration approaches have the potential to provide a more comprehensive functional understanding of biological systems and has numerous applications in areas such as disease diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. However, quantitative integration of multi-omic data is a complex task that requires the use of highly specialized methods and approaches. Here, we discuss a number of data integration methods that have been developed with multi-omics data in view, including statistical methods, machine learning approaches, and network-based approaches. We also discuss the challenges and limitations of such methods and provide examples of their applications in the literature. Overall, this review aims to provide an overview of the current state of the field and highlight potential directions for future research.

Indexed as

cancer biologydata integrationLASSOmulti-omicsregulatory modelsstatistical and probabilistic modelling

Identifiers

PMID39364009
PMCPMC11446849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.