ReviewBlood purification2024
Pharmacokinetic Research in Pediatric Extracorporeal Therapies: Current State and Future Directions.
Review in Blood purification, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Population pharmacokinetic model for meropenem in pediatric patients: a systematic review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Ceftaroline pharmacokinetics on ECMO, a pediatric case report.International journal of antimicrobial agents · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients on kidney replacement therapy: a comprehensive narrative review.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- The impact of an ex vivo paediatric renal replacement therapy circuit on antimicrobial concentrations.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Enhancing outcomes in pediatric populations with continuous renal replacement therapy: Current multidisciplinary strategies and innovations.Journal of intensive medicine · 2025Review
- Pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at a single center: Outcomes by indication, prognostic factors, and duration.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS), including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), are life-saving therapies for critically ill children. Despite this, these modalities carry frustratingly high mortality rates. One driver of mortality may be altered drug disposition due to a combination of underlying illness, patient-circuit interactions, and drug-circuit interactions. Children receiving ECMO and/or CRRT routinely receive 20 or more drugs, and data supporting optimal dosing is lacking for most of these medications. The Pediatric Paracorporeal and Extracorporeal Therapies Summit (PPETS) gathered an international group of experts in the fields of ECMO, CRRT, and other ECLS modalities to discuss the current state of these therapies, disseminate innovative support strategies, share clinical experiences, and foster future collaborations. Here, we summarize the conclusions of PPETS and put forward a pathway to optimize pharmacokinetic (PK) research in this population. We must prioritize specific medications for in-depth study to improve drug use in ECLS and patient outcomes. Based on frequency of use, potential for adverse outcomes if dosed inappropriately, and lack of existing PK data, a list of high priority drugs was compiled for future research. Researchers must additionally reconsider study designs, emphasizing pooling of resources through multi-center studies and the use of innovative PK modeling techniques. Finally, the integration of validated PK models into clinical practice must be streamlined to deliver optimal medication use at the bedside. Focusing on the proposed list of highlighted medications and key methodological considerations will maximize the impact of future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.