SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Clinical predictors of poor outcome of bacterial meningitis in infants less than 90 days: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Ten-year review of hospital-acquired neonatal meningitis in a tertiary-level NICU: the important role of acinetobacter species.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: bacterial meningitis (BM) is more common in infants than at any other time in life and remains a devastating disease with considerable risk of death and morbidity. This article aims to gather the currently available evidence to perform a systematic review of clinical factors that may predict or be associated with BM death and/or sequelae in infants < 90 days of age. Methods: The Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were systematically searched for prognostic studies that described risk factors for mortality and sequelae in infants aged <90d with BM. The databases were searched from the beginning of the database to December 31st, 2022.The quality of cohort studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The quality of cross-section studies was assessed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). A systematic review was undertaken to ascertain the prognostic factors proven to be noteworthy. Results: Of the 1,431 studies retrieved, 20 were eligible for the final analysis including 11 cohort and 9 cross-sectional studies were identified. Four risk factors predicting poor outcome were mentioned mostly in those studies, including prematurity or low birth weight (LBW), seizures, coma, and elevated CSF protein. But only preterm, coma and elevated CSF protein were identified by multivariate analyses in more than one study. Conclusions: This study demonstrates several potential predictive factors to the poor outcomes of BM in infant. But with large heterogeneity, these predictors should be evaluated by further well-designed prospective studies. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, identifier CRD42017074949.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.