ArticleJournal of pain research2024
Retrospective Comparison of Quadratus Lumborum and Pericapsular Nerve Group Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management of Patients Undergoing Outpatient Hip Arthroscopy.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of pericapsular nerve group block in hip arthroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hip arthroscopy is commonly performed as an outpatient procedure and effective postoperative pain management is important to provide quality patient care and enable timely discharge. Multiple regional nerve blocks have been described for pain relief after hip arthroscopy, but there is no consensus on the optimal technique. This retrospective investigation aimed to compare quadratus lumborum (QL) and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) blocks to determine if there are differences in analgesic outcomes after outpatient hip arthroscopy. Methods: A total of 50 consecutive patients that received QL block and 50 that received PENG block for outpatient hip arthroscopy were identified and compared to determine if there were any differences in the primary outcome of total perioperative opioid consumption prior to discharge from the surgery center. Important secondary analgesic outcomes include postoperative opioid consumption, verbal rating scale (VRS) pain scores or total time in the recovery area. Summary statistics of relevant variables are compared and reported between study groups (QL versus PENG). Results: For QL and PENG groups, no significant differences were observed in total perioperative oral morphine equivalents (OME) (69.5 vs 60mg; p=0.40), postoperative OME (15 vs 15.3mg; p=0.96) or maximum pain scores in the recovery area (7.0 vs 6.0; p=0.41). Postoperatively, QL block patients were in PACU for a greater length of time after surgery than PENG block patients (89.5 vs 72 minutes; p<0.001). No patients had uncontrolled pain requiring emergency room visits or hospital admission within 24 hours. No neurologic complications or instances of motor weakness were reported after QL or PENG blocks. Conclusion: This retrospective study observed similar opioid requirements and pain scores for patients receiving QL versus PENG block for hip arthroscopy, though PENG block patients had shorter times in the recovery area. Prospective, controlled trials are required to further explore and confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.