Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363942›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa2024

Changes in patient-reported outcomes during admission to a South African psychiatric facility.

Lerato Motshudi, Cherie-Dee Hann, Marilee Kloppers, Thierry Luhandjula, Tiro Phalatse, Damien Pretorius, Dianne Smith, Manuela Smith, Marius van der Westhuizen, Reitze N Rodseth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lerato MotshudiNetcare Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5210-8906
Cherie-Dee HannNetcare Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2055-563X
Marilee KloppersNetcare Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1929-934X
Thierry LuhandjulaNetcare Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7420-7123
Tiro PhalatseNetcare Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6228-1831
Damien PretoriusNetcare Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8526-1839
Dianne SmithNetcare Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9514-9229
Manuela SmithNetcare Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0120-9901
Marius van der WesthuizenNetcare Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4615-3122
Reitze N RodsethNetcare Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3779-7805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used as part of clinical practice to determine the impact of the condition and treatment interventions on a patient's health and quality of life. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a self-administered diagnostic tool that has been widely adopted for the detection and monitoring of depression. Aim: This analysis reports the change in PHQ-9 scores from admission to discharge in patients admitted for depression to a South African acute psychiatric facility and aims to quantify the treatment effect of the admission using the PHQ-9 as the measurement tool. Setting: South African acute psychiatric facility. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of all patients admitted to Netcare Akeso acute psychiatric facilities from 01 January 2018 to 31 October 2022. Patients were included if they were ≥ 18 years of age, admitted with a primary International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 code for depression (i.e. F32-F33) and fully completed both an admission and discharge PHQ-9 questionnaire. We excluded facilities focusing only on the treatment of patients with specialised conditions such as addiction or eating disorders. Results: This analysis included 13 308 patients admitted for depression at 10 different facilities. The median PHQ-9 score on admission was 19 (interquartile range [IQR] 14-23) and 5 (IQR 2-11) on discharge, with a median change of -12 (IQR -5 to -18). A minimal clinically important difference was seen in 87.6% patients ( Conclusion: With the average patient reporting a four-fold reduction in the severity of their depression scores, PROMs provide a critical patient-centred window into the benefit that an inpatient admission has on those suffering with depression. Contribution: These changes are consistent with those seen internationally and provide a baseline for understanding the treatment efficacy of an inpatient admission for the treatment of depression.

Indexed as

depressiondepression scorePatient-reported outcomePHQ-9PROMS

Identifiers

PMID39363942
PMCPMC11447592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.