Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363876›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

The Value of Topological Radiomics Analysis in Predicting Malignant Risk of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules: A Multi-Center Study.

Miaoyu Wang, Yuanhui Wei, Minghui Zhu, Hang Yu, Chaomin Guo, Zhigong Chen, Wenjia Shi, Jiabo Ren, Wei Zhao, Zhen Yang and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Miaoyu WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Yuanhui WeiSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Minghui ZhuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hang YuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Chaomin GuoLaboratory Medicine Department, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhigong ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wenjia ShiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Eighth Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiabo RenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Eighth Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhen YangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Eighth Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liang-An ChenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Eighth Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1829-3134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection and accurate differentiation of malignant ground-glass nodules (GGNs) in lung CT scans are crucial for the effective treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. However, existing imaging diagnostic methods often struggle to distinguish between benign and malignant GGNs in the early stages. This study aims to predict the malignancy risk of GGNs observed in lung CT scans by applying two radiomics methods: topological data analysis and texture analysis.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 3223 patients from two centers between January 2018 and June2023. The dataset was divided into training, testing, and validation sets to ensure robust model development and validation. We developed topological features applied to GGNs using radiomics analysis based on homology. This innovative approach emphasizes the integration of topological information, capturing complex geometric and spatial relationships within GGNs. By combining machine learning and deep learning algorithms, we established a predictive model that integrates clinical parameters, previous radiomics features, and topological radiomics features.

resultsIncorporating topological radiomics into our model significantly enhanced the ability to distinguish between benign and malignant GGNs. The topological radiomics model achieved areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 and 0.862 in two independent validation sets, outperforming previous radiomics models. Furthermore, this model demonstrated higher sensitivity compared to models based solely on clinical parameters, with sensitivities of 80.7% in validation set 1 and 82.3% in validation set 2. The most comprehensive model, which combined clinical parameters, previous radiomics features, and topological radiomics features, achieved the highest AUC value of 0.879 across all datasets.

conclusionThis study validates the potential of topological radiomics in improving the predictive performance for distinguishing between benign and malignant GGNs. By integrating topological features with previous radiomics and clinical parameters, our comprehensive model provides a more accurate and reliable basis for developing treatment strategies for patients with GGNs.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdenocarcinoma of LungAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSolitary Pulmonary Noduleearly diagnosisground-glass noduleslung adenocarcinomamachine learningmodeltopological radiomics

Identifiers

PMID39363876
PMCPMC11452904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.