Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363456›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2024

Intraoperative Management of Iatrogenic Durotomy in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Warayos Trathitephun, Akarawit Asawasaksakul, Khananut Jaruwanneechai, Boonserm Pakdeenit, Abhirat Suebsing, Yanting Liu, Jin-Sung Kim, Siravich Suvithayasiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transdural rootlet herniation- An exceptional complication of full endoscopic lumbar discectomy: case reports and review of literature.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Classification of endoscopic spine procedures.North American Spine Society journal · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Warayos TrathitephunDepartment of Orthopedics, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Akarawit AsawasaksakulSpine Clinic, Department of Orthopedics, Ramkhamhaeng Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Khananut JaruwanneechaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Warinchamrab Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
Boonserm PakdeenitOrthopedic Center, Bangkok Hospital Pattaya, Pattaya, Thailand.
Abhirat SuebsingDepartment of Orthopedics, Warinchamrab Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
Yanting LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Sung KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Siravich SuvithayasiriDepartment of Orthopedics, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aims to systematically evaluate the incidence, management strategies, and clinical outcomes of iatrogenic durotomy (ID) in endoscopic spine surgery and to propose a management flowchart based on the tear size and associated complications. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, focusing on studies involving endoscopic spinal procedures and incidental durotomy. The selected studies were analyzed for management techniques and outcomes, particularly in relation to the size of the dural tear and the presence of nerve root herniation. Based on these findings, a flowchart for intraoperative management was developed. A total of 14 studies were included, encompassing 68,546 patients. Varying incidences of ID, with management strategies largely dependent on the size of the dural tear, were found. Small tears (less than 5 mm) were often left untreated or managed with absorbable hemostatic agents, while medium (5-10 mm) and large tears (greater than 10 mm) required more complex approaches like endoscopic patch repair or open surgery. The presence of nerve root herniation necessitated immediate action, often influencing the decision to convert to open repair. Effective management of ID in endoscopic spine surgery requires a nuanced approach tailored to the size of the tear and specific intraoperative challenges, such as nerve root herniation. The proposed flowchart offers a structured approach to these complexities, potentially enhancing clinical outcomes and reducing complication rates. Future research with more rigorous methodologies is necessary to refine these management strategies further and broaden the applications of endoscopic spine surgery.

Indexed as

ComplicationDural injuryDura tearIatrogenic durotomyManagementSurgical techniqueSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39363456
PMCPMC11456941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.