Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363454›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2024

An Experimental Model for Fluid Dynamics and Pressures During Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.

Mazda Farshad, Alexandra Stauffer, Carl Moritz Zipser, Najmeh Kheram, José Miguel Spirig, Jonas Widmer, Vincent Hagel, Jana Felicitas Schader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tubular endoscopic spine surgery (TESS) for lumbar laminotomy: a technical feasibility study of a hybrid approach.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Controlled versus gravity-based irrigation in endoscopic spine surgery: pressure stability, thresholds, and safety implications.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mazda FarshadUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexandra StaufferUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carl Moritz ZipserSpinal Cord Injury Center and Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Najmeh KheramSpinal Cord Injury Center and Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
José Miguel SpirigUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas WidmerSpine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Vincent HagelUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jana Felicitas SchaderUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndoscopic spine surgery is an emerging technique of minimally invasive spine surgery. However, headache, seizure, and autonomic dysreflexia are possible irrigation-related complications following full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD). Pressure elevation through fluid irrigation may contribute to these adverse events. A validated experimental model to investigate parameters for guideline definition is lacking. This study aimed to create an experimental setting for FELD with pressure assessments to prove the concept of repeatable and sensitive measurement of intracranial, intra- and epidural pressures during spine endoscopy.

methodsTo measure intradural pressure, catheters were introduced through a sacral approach and advanced to lumbar, thoracic, and cervical levels in human cadavers. Similarly, lumbar epidural and intracranial probes were placed. The dural sac was filled with Ringer solution to a physiologic pressure of 15 cmH2O. Lumbar endoscopy was performed on 3 human cadavers at the L3-4 level. Pressure changes were measured continuously at all sites and the effects of backflow-occlusion were monitored.

resultsReproducibility of the experimental model was validated with catheters at the correct locations and stable compartmental pressure baselines at all levels for 3 specimens (mean±standard deviation: 1.3±2.9 mmHg, 9.0±2.0 mmHg, 6.0±1.2 mmHg, respectively). Pressure increase could be detected sensitively by closing the system with backflow-occlusion.

conclusionAn experimental setup for feasible, repeatable, and precise pressure measurement during FELD in a human cadaveric setup has been developed. This allows investigation of the effects of endoscopic techniques and pump pressures on intra-, epidural and intracranial pressure and enables ranges of safe pump pressures per clinical situations.

Indexed as

Endoscopic spine surgeryExperimental endoscopic setupIntradural pressureIrrigation pressureMinimally invasive spine surgerySpine endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39363454
PMCPMC11456936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.