ArticleNeurospine2024
An Experimental Model for Fluid Dynamics and Pressures During Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.
Article in Neurospine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Tubular endoscopic spine surgery (TESS) for lumbar laminotomy: a technical feasibility study of a hybrid approach.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Controlled versus gravity-based irrigation in endoscopic spine surgery: pressure stability, thresholds, and safety implications.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Spinal cord-like hypertension syndrome with metabolic acidosis and pulmonary edema following lumbar discectomy under general anesthesia: a case report.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Complication Management During Uniportal and Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Dural Tear and Bleeding.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for acute spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma at the cervicothoracic junction: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Endoscopic resection of lumbar intradural spinal tumors: A case series on feasibility, safety, and preliminary outcomes.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Risk Analysis of Neurological Deterioration Associated With Fluid Insufflation in Uniportal Spine Endoscopy: A Case Series and Literature Review.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- Intra-, Epidural And Intracranial Pressure Changes During Interlaminar Endoscopy, With and Without Dural Tear.Neurospine · 2025Article
- Full-Endoscopic Resection of a Lumbar Intradural Tumor (Schwannoma): Video Case Report and Description of the Surgical Technique.Neurospine · 2024Article
- Endoscopic Transforaminal Thoracic Decompression for Removal of a Giant Calcified Thoracic Disc Herniation.Neurospine · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEndoscopic spine surgery is an emerging technique of minimally invasive spine surgery. However, headache, seizure, and autonomic dysreflexia are possible irrigation-related complications following full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD). Pressure elevation through fluid irrigation may contribute to these adverse events. A validated experimental model to investigate parameters for guideline definition is lacking. This study aimed to create an experimental setting for FELD with pressure assessments to prove the concept of repeatable and sensitive measurement of intracranial, intra- and epidural pressures during spine endoscopy.
methodsTo measure intradural pressure, catheters were introduced through a sacral approach and advanced to lumbar, thoracic, and cervical levels in human cadavers. Similarly, lumbar epidural and intracranial probes were placed. The dural sac was filled with Ringer solution to a physiologic pressure of 15 cmH2O. Lumbar endoscopy was performed on 3 human cadavers at the L3-4 level. Pressure changes were measured continuously at all sites and the effects of backflow-occlusion were monitored.
resultsReproducibility of the experimental model was validated with catheters at the correct locations and stable compartmental pressure baselines at all levels for 3 specimens (mean±standard deviation: 1.3±2.9 mmHg, 9.0±2.0 mmHg, 6.0±1.2 mmHg, respectively). Pressure increase could be detected sensitively by closing the system with backflow-occlusion.
conclusionAn experimental setup for feasible, repeatable, and precise pressure measurement during FELD in a human cadaveric setup has been developed. This allows investigation of the effects of endoscopic techniques and pump pressures on intra-, epidural and intracranial pressure and enables ranges of safe pump pressures per clinical situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.