Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363349›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2024

Evaluation of Salmonella biofilm attachment and hydrophobicity characteristics on food contact surfaces.

Colton Ivers, Eda C Kaya, Umut Yucel, Dan Boyle, Valentina Trinetta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Comparative Biofilmomics of Antimicrobial-ResistantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  4. Antibiofilm efficacy of phage W5 against antimicrobial-resistantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Efficacy of peracetic acid and chlorine in managingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Persistence of non-typhoidalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Rapid Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Colton IversFood Nutrition Dietetics and Health Department, Kansas State University, 1310 Research Drive Park, Manhattan, KS, 66502, United States.
Eda C KayaFood Nutrition Dietetics and Health Department, Kansas State University, 1310 Research Drive Park, Manhattan, KS, 66502, United States.
Umut YucelFood Nutrition Dietetics and Health Department, Kansas State University, 1310 Research Drive Park, Manhattan, KS, 66502, United States.
Dan BoyleDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, 6 Ackert Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Valentina TrinettaFood Nutrition Dietetics and Health Department, Kansas State University, 1310 Research Drive Park, Manhattan, KS, 66502, United States. vtrinetta@ksu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella forms biofilms, and persist on food contact surfaces. Once a biofilm is formed cleaning and sanitation protocols may be inadequate for effective removal. This study evaluated attachment characteristics, surface properties, and structure of Salmonella biofilms on food contact surfaces commonly used in the tree-fruit industry. Multi-strain Salmonella biofilms were grown in a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) biofilm reactor at 22 ± 2 °C and sampling was conducted at 2, 24 and 96-h. After each incubation period, coupons weregently rinsed and the remaining cells enumerated. Biofilms were analyzed with Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSCM). Hydrophobicity was evaluated by measuring the contact angles of reference liquids method using a drop tensiometer instrument. Material type and biofilm age significantly influenced attachment and biofilm hydrophobicity (P < 0.05). The strength of attachment, across all time points, was highest on nylon followed by wood and high-density polyethylene. The highest contact angle measurements were observed after 96-h of biofilm formation for each material. All the results and observations from this study contribute to a better understanding of the attachment and hydrophobicity characteristics of Salmonella and might help producers make informed decisions when selecting containers for harvesting and storing in order to minimize biofilm formation and potential for cross-contamination.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionBiofilmsFood MicrobiologyHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsSalmonellaFood ContaminationMicroscopy, ConfocalSurface PropertiesAttachmentBiofilmHydrophobicitySalmonella

Identifiers

PMID39363349
PMCPMC11447956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.