Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363347›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Reducing low-value imaging - stakeholders' assessment of an intervention to improve imaging services.

Elin Kjelle, Ingrid Øfsti Brandsæter, Eivind Richter Andersen, Bjørn Morten Hofmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elin KjelleDepartment of Health Sciences Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 2802, Gjøvik, Norway.
Ingrid Øfsti BrandsæterDepartment of Health Sciences Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 2802, Gjøvik, Norway. ingrid.o.brandsater@ntnu.no.
Eivind Richter AndersenDepartment of Health Sciences Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 2802, Gjøvik, Norway.
Bjørn Morten HofmannDepartment of Health Sciences Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 2802, Gjøvik, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn intervention to reduce low-value magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was designed and implemented in private imaging centres in Norway in October 2022. The intervention used return letters for poor referrals of MRI of the lower back, brain and knee at private imaging centres in Norway. The study aimed to investigate key stakeholders' experiences and assessment of the intervention and the specific research questions were: • How many return letters were sent during the study period? • What were the medical directors' and managers' experiences with and reflection on success factors for the intervention implementation and using return letters?

methodsThe number of return letters sent was collected directly from Norway's two main private imaging providers. Two semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with the medical directors of the imaging providers, as well as two focus group interviews with nine managers from the various private imaging centres operated by the two imaging providers.

resultsIn total, 1,182 return letters were sent for patients undergoing one of the three types of MRI examinations, and the number of return letters was highest at the beginning of the intervention. The interview analysis resulted in five categories: general experience, anchoring, organisation, return letter procedure and outcome. Sufficient information, anchoring and support were identified as crucial success factors.

conclusionsThis study provides insights into the practical and crucial details of implementing interventions to reduce low-value imaging. The intervention was generally well received, and the high initial number of return letters decreased rapidly over the course of the study. Several key success factors were identified.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansInterviews as TopicNorwayQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementReferral and ConsultationStakeholder ParticipationChoosing wisely campaignEvaluationLow-value imagingMulticomponent interventionRadiology

Identifiers

PMID39363347
PMCPMC11448175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.