Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363336›Full record

ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2024

Frailty; Time for Global Action : Commentary on "Frailty and its Association with Long-Term Mortality among Community-Dwelling older adults aged 75 years and Over".

Yotam Weiss, Idit Matot

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yotam WeissDivision of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel- Aviv University, 6 Weizmann St, Tel-Aviv, 6423906, Israel. yotamw@tlvmc.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1682-0196
Idit MatotDivision of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel- Aviv University, 6 Weizmann St, Tel-Aviv, 6423906, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary examines the study "Frailty and Its Association with Long-Term Mortality Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults Aged 75 Years and Over" by Lewis et al. The retrospective cohort study utilized data from a primary healthcare provider in Israel to investigate frailty using the Frailty Index (FI) and its correlation with long-term mortality. Nearly half of the older adult cohort was identified as frail, with a strong association between higher frailty levels and increased mortality risk. The commentary emphasizes the importance of routine frailty screening in clinical practice and health policy. Integrating FI calculations into electronic health records can facilitate timely care for high-risk individuals. However, presenting frailty data must be managed carefully and in conjunction with patients' preferences to avoid stigmatizing and negatively influencing clinical decisions. While the FI is a valuable tool, it should complement, not replace, other assessments that provide a more holistic view of the patient's health. Furthermore, the commentary strongly advocates for a more comprehensive approach to patient care, emphasizing that non-geriatricians must also be proficient in recognizing and managing frailty. Effectively addressing frailty can lead to significant cost savings for healthcare systems, reduced burden on healthcare facilities, and decreased need for long-term care.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyIndependent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansIsraelMaleMortalityRetrospective StudiesClinical practiceFrailtyFrailty IndexHealth policyIsraelLong-term mortalityOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID39363336
PMCPMC11451099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.