ArticleThrombosis journal2024
Subacute in-stent thrombosis after carotid artery stenting in a patient with gene polymorphisms associated with aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: a case report.
Article in Thrombosis journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCarotid artery stenting (CAS) is a key treatment option for moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis. Carotid stent thrombosis (CST), a rare complication of CAS, has gained significant attention because of its catastrophic nature. More evidences are needed to guide the diagnosis and treatment of CST. CASE PRESENTATION: This study reports a rare case of sub-acute CST following CAS in a 50-year-old male patient who had experienced repeated cerebrovascular events on the premise of taking antiplatelet drugs. He also suffered an occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA) in the M2 segment, likely caused by an embolus detached from the stent thrombus. The cause of CST in this patient was presumed to be dual antiplatelet resistance (AR), as indicated by genetic testing. After treated with guide catheter-directed thrombolysis, thrombus aspiration, and a second round of thrombolysis, his in-stent thrombus was basically cleared. His M2 occlusion was resolved by mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire FR/Stent with Intermediate Catheter Assisting technique. The patient recovered well after replacement of antiplatelet drugs, and no new thromboembolic event occurred during the 13-month follow-up period.
conclusionsThe occurrence rate of AR-related CST may be underestimated as the cause of majority CST cases remains unclear. Implementation of genetic test for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance may be helpful to find the possible cause of CST and to avoid future repeated cerebrovascular events by replacement of antiplatelet drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.