Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363331›Full record

SynthesisParasites & vectors2024

Host diversity of Aedes albopictus in relation to invasion history: a meta-analysis of blood-feeding studies.

László Zsolt Garamszegi

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evidence of dengue virus transmission and a diversebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

László Zsolt GaramszegiInstitute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Alkotmány u. 2-4, 2163, Vácrátót, Hungary. garamszegi.laszlo@ecolres.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8920-2183

Funding

National Research, Development and Innovation Office K-135841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus is a major concern for human and animal health given its high potential to spread over large geographical distances, adapt to various habitats and food sources, and act as a vector for pathogens. It is crucial to understand how this species establishes ecological relationships at different locations, as it determines its role in transmission of diseases.

methodsBased on published blood meal surveys, a meta-analysis was performed to investigate how host diversity changes along the process of invasion at a large scale. For 48 independent localities, the Shannon diversity index was calculated and was then assessed against several moderator variables describing invasion status, habitat type, methodology, survey year and the year of introduction for invasive populations.

resultsDiet diversity was higher in the invasive than in the native populations when the strong habitat effects were held constant. Furthermore, the year of introduction also had a significant role, as invasive populations that had been established earlier had wider diet diversity than more recent populations.

conclusionsInvasive Ae. albopictus has considerable ecological flexibility. The species' ability to adapt to various food sources goes hand in hand with its successful worldwide dispersion, which has strong implications for its role in pathogen transmission.

Indexed as

AedesFeeding BehaviorIntroduced SpeciesMosquito VectorsAnimalsBiodiversityDietEcosystemHumansEcological nicheEmerging infectious diseasesHost rangeHuman-biting rateLiterature reviewVector competence

Identifiers

PMID39363331
PMCPMC11448256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.