ArticleBMC psychiatry2024
Exploring the association between consultation themes and suicidal ideation: a gender-stratified analysis of Hangzhou Mental Health Hotline (2014-2023).
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuicide is a critical global public health issue that demands a better understanding of its complex causes and effective interventions. This study examines data from the Hangzhou Mental Health Hotline (2014-2023) to explore the relationship between consultation themes and suicidal ideation, with an emphasis on gender differences and how these associations changed during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsThis retrospective analysis covers 128,245 calls to the hotline over a decade. Chi-square tests identified differences in suicidal ideation across consultation themes and demographics. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between specific themes and suicidal ideation, adjusting for confounders. The analysis was stratified by gender and pandemic phases to assess the interaction between gender and pandemic-related changes.
resultsThe incidence of suicidal ideation was highest during the mid-pandemic phase (11.95%), compared to the pre-pandemic (7.68%) and post-pandemic phases (10.66%). Additionally, the rate was slightly higher among female callers (9.8%) than male callers (9.4%). Physical illness (OR = 4.70, 95% CI: 3.71-5.91) had the strongest association with suicidal ideation, followed by mental health issues (OR = 3.35, 95% CI: 3.03-3.70). Compared to male callers, female callers were more significantly affected by physical illness (OR = 6.86 vs. OR = 3.71, p < 0.001) and mental health issues (OR = 6.81 vs. OR = 2.11, p < 0.001). In the context of romantic relationship problems, female callers had a higher likelihood of suicidal ideation (OR = 4.13 vs. OR = 1.88, p < 0.001). Similarly, marital and family issues were more strongly associated with suicidal ideation in female callers (OR = 4.58 vs. OR = 1.21, p < 0.001). During the global COVID-19 pandemic, the association between suicidal ideation and consultation themes among male callers showed a sharp upward trend, which eased after the pandemic. In contrast, the association among female callers gradually accumulated and continued to worsen in the later stages of the pandemic.
conclusionThis study highlights the necessity of implementing gender-sensitive mental health interventions tailored to different gender groups during and after global crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, to safeguard public mental health effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.