ArticleBMC medical education2024
Does learning style influence performance in objective structured clinical examinations?
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of undergraduate nursing students across Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): a retrospective cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Learning Style Profiles of Second-Year MBBS Students in a Medical College Situated in Remote Islands of India.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObjective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) aim to assess medical students' clinical skills rather than just their theoretical knowledge. We propose a study between the learning style of second-cycle medical students and their performance in OSCEs.
methodsDuring their internship at our hospital, students were invited to complete the LSQ-Fa, a questionnaire designed to identify their preferences among 4 learning styles: active, reflective, theoretical, and pragmatic. In parallel, an evaluation of their clinical skills was conducted through OSCEs. We then performed an analysis to establish a correlation between learning styles and OSCE performance, to better understand how learning preferences influence academic outcomes.
resultsBetween April 2021 and January 2023, 55 students were evaluated by OSCEs and had completed the LSQ-Fa. The average OSCE score was 14.8/20. The theoretical learning style was predominant in 47.3% of students, followed by active (27.3%), reflective (14.6%), and pragmatic (5.4%), with 3 cases of mixed active and theoretical styles (5.4%). No significant correlation was observed between learning style and OSCE performance (p = 0.28), although students with a pragmatic style recorded a slightly higher average.
conclusionThis study highlights the importance of considering diverse learning styles in the design of medical education programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.