ArticleBMC cancer2024
A clinically applicable model more suitable for predicting malignancy or benignity of pulmonary ground glass nodules in women patients.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Incidence and risk factors for malignancy in patients with incidental solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The infiltration risk prediction models by logistic regression for ground-glass pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning-based prediction of invasiveness in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass nodules using radiomics and clinical CT features.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, clinicians often encounter patients with multiple pulmonary nodules in their clinical practices. As most of these ground glass nodules (GGNs) are small in volume and show no spicule sign, it is difficult to use Mayo Clinic Model to make early diagnosis of lung cancer accurately, especially in large numbers of nonsmoking women who have no tumor history. Other clinical models are disadvantaged by a relatively high false-positive or false-negative rate. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish a new model of predicting malignancy or benignity of pulmonary GGNs for the sake of making accurate and early diagnosis of lung cancer.
methodsIncluded in this study were GGNs surgically resected from patients who were admitted to Yiwu Central Hospital from January 2018 to March 2024, including both male and female patients, there is no gender specific issue. The nature of all these GGN tissues was confirmed pathologically. The case data were statistically analyzed to establish a mathematical prediction model, the prediction performance of which was verified by the pathological results.
resultsAltogether 261 GGN patients met the inclusion criteria. Using the results of logistic regression analysis, a mathematical prediction equation was established as follows: Malignant probability (mP) = e
conclusionIn this study, we identified female gender, mGGN, VCS, mean CT value and maximum nodule diameter as five key factors for predicting malignancy or benignity of pulmonary nodules, based on which we established a mathematical prediction model. This novel innovation may provide a useful auxiliary tool for predicting malignancy and benignity of pulmonary nodules, especially in women patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.