ArticleBMC oral health2024
Influence of light-polymerizing units and zirconia on the physical, chemical and biological properties of self-adhesive resin cements.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Different Self-Adhesive Resin Cements and Curing Through Zirconia on Gingival Fibroblasts.International dental journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSelf-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) are widely used for fixed prostheses, but incomplete cleaning near the gingival margin can cause inflammation. However, the factors influencing cement properties and the biological response of gingival fibroblasts to cement eluates are not well understood. This study examines the impact of two light-polymerizing units (LPUs) on the physical and chemical properties of two SARCs under simulated clinical conditions, as well as the subsequent response of human gingival fibroblasts (hGFs) to these eluates.
methodsDental cement discs of SARCs were polymerized using Kerr DemiPlus and 3 M Elipar DeepCure-S LED LPUs with or without a 2-mm thick zirconia screen. Physical properties (microhardness, surface roughness, residual monomers) were evaluated. hGFs' cell viability, wound healing potency, and gene expression were assessed.
resultsBoth Maxcem and RelyX exhibited reduced microhardness and increased surface roughness when polymerized through zirconia or with DemiPlus LPU. Higher residual monomers (HEMA and GDMA in Maxcem; TEGDMA in RelyX) concentration was observed with DemiPlus and zirconia polymerization. Maxcem polymerized with DemiPlus exhibited lower cell viability, impaired healing, and altered gene expression in hGFs compared to those polymerized with Elipar LPU. Gene expression changes included downregulated NRF2 and HO-1 and upregulated CCR-3.
conclusionsLight-polymerizing Maxcem through zirconia with DemiPlus LPU compromised SARCs' properties, leading to higher residual monomers and negatively impacting hGFs' viability, healing, and gene expression. Careful material selection and polymerization techniques are crucial to minimize adverse effects on surrounding tissues. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians should exercise caution when using LPUs and SARCs, especially when polymerizing through zirconia. This will help optimize the physical and chemical properties of SARCs and minimize potential adverse effects on the surrounding gingival soft tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.