ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024
Is DEB-TACE as locoregional therapy before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma effective?
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objectives were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as locoregional therapy (LRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplantation (LT) beyond Hangzhou criteria (HC) and to analyze the prognostic factors.
methodsForty patients with HCC beyond HC who received DEB-TACE only before LT were retrospectively analyzed between January 2017 and December 2022. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment response, and adverse events (AE) were collected. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with RFS and OS.
resultsAll patients successfully underwent LT following DEB-TACE with a mean interval of 2.3 months. The objective response rates (ORRs) for these patients following DEB-TACE was 82.5%. The primary AE was post-embolization syndrome (PES), with affected patients experiencing grades I and II. The median RFS and OS were 12.0 months (95%CI: 0.0-30.1) and 52.0 months (95%CI: 11.8-92.2) over the follow-up period until December 2022. The 2-year RFS and OS rates were 42.5%, and 67.5%. Multivariate analyses revealed Child-Pugh classification (HR = 6.24; 95%CI,1.83-21.24; P = 0.01) and macrovascular invasion (MAV) (HR = 3.89; 95%CI,1.07-14.15; P = 0.04) were both significant independent predictors of OS.
conclusionsDEB-TACE can serve as a safe and effective LRT in HCC patients beyond HC before LT, and can improve the prognosis of patients, especially without MAV. The higher Child-Pugh classification and MAV are independent prognostic factors after LT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.