Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Establishment of seven lung ultrasound phenotypes: a retrospective observational study of an LUS registry.
Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Predictive Model Based on Cardio and Lung Ultrasound Features for Differential Diagnosis of Cardiogenic and Non-cardiogenic Dyspnea in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Single-Center Observational Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Observational
- Multimodal Diagnostic Ultrasound for Congestion, Perfusion, and Ultrafiltration Tolerance in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- MFFC-Net: Multi-feature Fusion Deep Networks for Classifying Pulmonary Edema of a Pilot Study by Using Lung Ultrasound Image with Texture Analysis and Transfer Learning Technique.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Critical care ultrasound: development, evolution, current and evolving clinical concepts in critical care medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung phenotypes have been extensively utilized to assess lung injury and guide precise treatment. However, current phenotypic evaluation methods rely on CT scans and other techniques. Although lung ultrasound (LUS) is widely employed in critically ill patients, there is a lack of comprehensive and systematic identification of LUS phenotypes based on clinical data and assessment of their clinical value.
methodsOur study was based on a retrospective database. A total of 821 patients were included from September 2019 to October 2020. 1902 LUS examinations were performed in this period. Using a dataset of 55 LUS examinations focused on lung injuries, a group of experts developed an algorithm for classifying LUS phenotypes based on clinical practice, expert experience, and lecture review. This algorithm underwent validation and refinement with an additional 140 LUS images, leading to five iterative revisions and the generation of 1902 distinct LUS phenotypes. Subsequently, a validated machine learning algorithm was applied to these phenotypes. To assess the algorithm's effectiveness, experts manually verified 30% of the phenotypes, confirming its efficacy. Using K-means cluster analysis and expert image selection from the 1902 LUS examinations, we established seven distinct LUS phenotypes. To further explore the diagnostic value of these phenotypes for clinical diagnosis, we investigated their auxiliary diagnostic capabilities.
resultsA total of 1902 LUS phenotypes were tested by randomly selecting 30% to verify the phenotypic accuracy. With the 1902 LUS phenotypes, seven lung ultrasound phenotypes were established through statistical K-means cluster analysis and expert screening. The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exhibited gravity-dependent phenotypes, while the cardiogenic pulmonary edema exhibited nongravity phenotypes. The baseline characteristics of the 821 patients included age (66.14 ± 11.76), sex (560/321), heart rate (96.99 ± 23.75), mean arterial pressure (86.5 ± 13.57), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II)score (20.49 ± 8.60), and duration of ICU stay (24.50 ± 26.22); among the 821 patients, 78.8% were cured. In severe pneumonia patients, the gravity-dependent phenotype accounted for 42% of the cases, whereas the nongravity-dependent phenotype constituted 58%. These findings highlight the value of applying different LUS phenotypes in various diagnoses.
conclusionsSeven sets of LUS phenotypes were established through machine learning analysis of retrospective data; these phenotypes could represent the typical characteristics of patients with different types of critical illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.