ArticleBMC health services research2024
Routine health data use for decision making and its associated factors among primary healthcare managers in dodoma region.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The scope of public health nursing practice in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Surviving institutional contradictions: routine data use practices at the subnational levels.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
- Organisational and management factors and related end-users' perspectives relevant to newborn and stillbirth data at different levels of the health system: findings of the IMPULSE study in Uganda, Ethiopia, Tanzania, and the Central African Republic.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Continuity of maternal and newborn health service provision among private sector players following donor transition. Hope amidst challenging implementation experiences in Uganda.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- Surgical indicators for obstetrics and family planning in routine health information systems: a landscape analysis.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData demand and use culture have a tremendous impact on the proper allocation of scarce resources and evidence-based decision making. However, primary healthcare managers in the majority of Sub-Saharan African countries continue to struggle with using routine health data for decision-making. PURPOSE/
objectiveThis study aimed to assess routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers in Dodoma region.
methodsCross-sectional study design involved 188 primary healthcare managers from Dodoma City Council, Kondoa Town Council and Bahi District Council was conducted. A self-administered questionnaire adapted from the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) tools was used to collect the data. Data was analysed by using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) program. Principal Component Analysis was used to find the level of routine health data use, binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers. The study was conducted from May to June, 2022.
resultsThe level of adequate routine health data use for decision making among healthcare managers was 63.30%. Factors associated with adequate routine health data use for decision making among healthcare managers were; respondents characteristics: years of working experience (OR = 1.955, 95% CI= [0.892,4.287]), district surveyed (OR = 4.760, 95%CI= [1.412,16.049]), level of health facility (OR = 3.867, 95%CI= [1.354,7.122]) and male gender (OR = 1.901, 95%CI= [1.027,3.521]). Individual factors: comparing data with strategic objectives (OR = 2.986, 95%CI= [1.233-7.229]), decision based on health needs (OR = 7.330, 95%CI= [1.968-27.295]) and decision based on detection of outbreak (OR = 3.769, 95%CI= [1.091-13.019]). Technical factors: ability to check data accuracy (OR = 3.120, 95%CI= [1.682-5.789]), ability to explain findings and its implication (OR = 2.443, 95%CI= [1.278-4.670]) and ability to use information to identity gaps and targets (OR = 2.621, 95%CI= [1.381-4.974]). Organizational factors: organizational support (OR = 3.530, CI= [1.397-8.919]), analyse data regularly (OR = 2.026, 95%CI= [1.075-3.820]) and displays information on key performance indicators (OR = 3.464, 95%CI= [1.525-7.870]). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The level of routine health data use for decision making among primary healthcare managers was found to be modest. The level of data demand and use culture may increase more quickly if capacity building is strengthened and issues that de-motivate primary health care managers from using data are addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.