Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363107›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2025

Multiplexed chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing for quantitative study of histone modifications and chromatin factors.

Banushree Kumar, Carmen Navarro, Philip Yuk Kwong Yung, Jing Lyu, Angelo Salazar Mantero, Anna-Maria Katsori, Hannah Schwämmle, Marcel Martin, Simon J Elsässer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2025
    Article
  7. Epigenetic mechanisms in stem cell therapies for achilles tendinopathy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Banushree Kumar *Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9200-6773
Carmen Navarro *Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5438-9654
Philip Yuk Kwong Yung *Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2926-6980
Jing LyuScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Angelo Salazar ManteroScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Anna-Maria KatsoriScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Hannah SchwämmleScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Marcel MartinDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.
Simon J ElsässerScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden. simon.elsasser@scilifelab.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8724-4849

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2020-04313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ChIP-seq is a widely used technique for studying histone post-translational modifications and DNA-binding proteins. DNA fragments associated with a specific protein or histone modification epitope are captured by using antibodies, sequenced and mapped to a reference genome. Albeit versatile and popular, performing many parallel ChIP-seq experiments to compare different conditions, replicates and epitopes is laborious, is prone to experimental variation and does not allow quantitative comparisons unless adequate spike-in chromatin is included. We present a detailed protocol for performing and analyzing a multiplexed quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing experiment (MINUTE-ChIP), in which multiple samples are profiled against multiple epitopes in a single workflow. Multiplexing not only dramatically increases the throughput of ChIP-seq experiments (e.g., profiling 12 samples against multiple histone modifications or DNA-binding proteins in a single experiment), but also enables accurate quantitative comparisons. The protocol consists of four parts: sample preparation (i.e., lysis, chromatin fragmentation and barcoding of native or formaldehyde-fixed material), pooling and splitting of the barcoded chromatin into parallel immunoprecipitation reactions, preparation of next-generation sequencing libraries from input and immunoprecipitated DNA and data analysis using our dedicated analysis pipeline. This pipeline autonomously generates quantitatively scaled ChIP-seq tracks for downstream analysis and visualization, alongside necessary quality control indicators. The entire workflow requires basic knowledge in molecular biology and bioinformatics and can be completed in 1 week. MINUTE-ChIP empowers biologists to perform every ChIP-seq experiment with an appropriate number of replicates and control conditions, delivering more statistically robust, exquisitely quantitative and biologically meaningful results.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingHistone CodeHistonesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalChromatinHistones

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.