Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363072›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Validation of Golden Gate Assemblies Using Highly Multiplexed Nanopore Amplicon Sequencing.

Adán A Ramírez Rojas, Cedric K Brinkmann, Daniel Schindler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adán A Ramírez RojasMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.
Cedric K BrinkmannMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.
Daniel SchindlerMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany. daniel.schindler@mpi-marburg.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Golden Gate cloning has revolutionized synthetic biology. Its concept of modular, highly characterized libraries of parts that can be combined into higher order assemblies allows engineering principles to be applied to biological systems. The basic parts, typically stored in Level 0 plasmids, are sequence validated by the method of choice and can be combined into higher order assemblies on demand. Higher order assemblies are typically transcriptional units, and multiple transcriptional units can be assembled into multi-gene constructs. Higher order Golden Gate assembly based on defined and validated parts usually does not introduce sequence changes. Therefore, simple validation of the assemblies, e.g., by colony polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or restriction digest pattern analysis is sufficient. However, in many experimental setups, researchers do not use defined parts, but rather part libraries, resulting in assemblies of high combinatorial complexity where sequencing again becomes mandatory. Here, we present a detailed protocol for the use of a highly multiplexed dual barcode amplicon sequencing using the Nanopore sequencing platform for in-house sequence validation. The workflow, called DuBA.flow, is a start-to-finish procedure that provides all necessary steps from a single colony to the final easy-to-interpret sequencing report.

Indexed as

Nanopore SequencingSynthetic BiologyCloning, MolecularGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNanoporesPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNAWorkflowamplicon sequencingColony PCRDNA assembly validationDual-barcode amplicon sequencingEnzymatic fragmentationGolden Gate assembly validationLaboratory automationNanopore sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39363072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.