Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39363071›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Automation and Miniaturization of Golden Gate DNA Assembly Reactions Using Acoustic Dispensers.

Tania S Köbel, Daniel Schindler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tania S KöbelMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.
Daniel SchindlerMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany. daniel.schindler@mpi-marburg.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Golden Gate cloning has become one of the most popular DNA assembly techniques. Its modular and hierarchical structure allows the construction of complex DNA fragments. Over time, Golden Gate cloning allows for the creation of a repository of reusable parts, reducing the cost of frequent sequence validation. However, as the number of reactions and fragments increases, so does the cost of consumables and the potential for human error. Typically, Golden Gate reactions are performed in volumes of 10-25 μL. Recent technological advances have led to the development of liquid handling robots that use sound to transfer liquids in the nL range from a source plate to a target plate. These acoustic dispensers have become particularly popular in the field of synthetic biology. The use of this technology allows miniaturization and parallelization of molecular reactions in a tip-free manner, making it sustainable by reducing plastic waste and reagent usage. Here, we provide a step-by-step protocol for performing and parallelizing Golden Gate cloning reactions in 1 μL total volume.

Indexed as

AcousticsCloning, MolecularDNAMiniaturizationAutomationRoboticsSynthetic BiologyDNAAcoustic liquid handlingDNA assemblyGolden Gate cloningIn vitronL reactionsSustainabilitySynthetic biology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.