Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39362984›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Fiddler crabs (Afruca tangeri) detect second-order motion in both intensity and polarization.

Samuel P Smithers, Maisie F Brett, Martin J How, Nicholas E Scott-Samuel, Nicholas W Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Two Decapod Crustaceans,Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel P SmithersSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol Life Sciences Building, Bristol, UK. s.smithers@northeastern.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2781-7067
Maisie F BrettSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol Life Sciences Building, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7680-1718
Martin J HowSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol Life Sciences Building, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5135-8828
Nicholas E Scott-SamuelSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nicholas W RobertsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol Life Sciences Building, Bristol, UK. nicholas.roberts@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4540-6683

Funding

Royal Society UF140558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion vision is vital for a wide range of animal behaviors. Fiddler crabs, for example, rely heavily on motion to detect the movement of avian predators. They are known to detect first-order motion using both intensity (defined by spatiotemporal correlations in luminance) and polarization information (defined separately as spatiotemporal correlations in the degree and/or angle of polarization). However, little is known about their ability to detect second-order motion, another important form of motion information; defined separately by spatiotemporal correlations in higher-order image properties. In this work we used behavioral experiments to test how fiddler crabs (Afruca tangeri) responded to both second-order intensity and polarization stimuli. Fiddler crabs responded to a number of different intensity based second-order stimuli. Furthermore, the crabs also responded to second-order polarization stimuli, a behaviorally relevant stimulus applicable to an unpolarized flying bird when viewed against a polarized sky. The detection of second-order motion in polarization is, to the best of our knowledge, the first demonstration of this ability in any animal. This discovery therefore opens a new dimension in our understanding of how animals use polarization vision for target detection and the broader importance of second-order motion detection for animal behavior.

Indexed as

BrachyuraAnimalsBehavior, AnimalMaleMotion PerceptionPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39362984
PMCPMC11450093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.