ArticleScientific reports2024
Investigating the relationship between blood metabolites and diabetic retinopathy using two-sample mendelian randomization and in vivo validation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We addressed fundamental questions about the influence of metabolites on the development of Diabetic retinopathy (DR), and explored the related pathological mechanism. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) database data for metabolites and DR were used to perform Mendelian randomization (MR) studies. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) was chosen as the primary analysis method. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using MR-PRESSO, leave-one-out and Cochran's Q test. Confounding factors were eliminated to ensure robustness. We also conducted metabolic pathway analysis. In vivo experimental validation was conducted using Sprague Dawley rats. The serum metabolites of the DR group rats and normal group rats were examined to evaluate the MR results. The screen identified eighteen metabolites associated with DR risk, twelve of which were known components. Seven metabolites were positively correlated with DR risk, while five could reduce it. Eight metabolites associated with proliferative DR (PDR) risk were identified, four of which are known components. Three of these were positively associated with PDR risk and one metabolite reduced PDR risk. Additionally, two possible metabolic pathways involved in the biological mechanism of DR were identified. The ELISA results showed that the serum levels of isoleucine and 4-HPA were significantly increased in DR rats, while the level of inosine was decreased. This study offers novel insights into the biological mechanisms underlying DR. Metabolites that are causally linked to DR may serve as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.