ArticleScientific reports2024
Diagnosing skin cancer using social spider optimization (SSO) and error correcting output codes (ECOC) with weighted hamming distance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin cancer is a common disease resulting from genetic defects, and early detection is critical to improve treatment outcomes. Diagnostic programs that use computer aid especially those that use supervised learning are very useful in early diagnosis of skin cancer. This research therefore presents a new approach that integrates optimization methods with supervised learning to improve skin cancer diagnosis using machine vision approach. The presented method is initiated by data pre-processing that involves the removal of unnecessary data. Then, to segment the images, a combination of K-means clustering and social spider optimization technique is employed. The region of interest is then extracted from the segmented image and from this region a convolutional neural network extracts the significant features. To enhance the classification performance as compared with the standard classifiers, this research introduces a new concept of error correcting output codes coupled with a weighted Hamming distance in the group of gamma classifiers. The ability of the proposed approach in segmentation of skin lesions and classifying them was tested using samples from the ISIC-2017 and ISIC-2016 databases. The introduced method obtained state-of-the-art accuracy on both datasets (ISIC-2016: 97.10%, ISIC-2017: 95.17%). In particularly, the accuracy of the introduced approach for both these databases is at least 1.17% higher than the compared methods. This proves the high performance of the suggested method based on the usage of the convolutional neural networks for feature extraction and gamma classifiers with error correcting output codes for classification in skin cancer detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.