Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39362902›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Developmental and housekeeping transcriptional programs display distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity in Drosophila.

Vincent Loubiere, Bernardo P de Almeida, Michaela Pagani, Alexander Stark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Locus-Scale Massively Parallel Reporter Assays.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vincent LoubiereResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3632-378X
Bernardo P de AlmeidaResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Michaela PaganiResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Alexander StarkResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria. stark@starklab.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2611-0841

Funding

European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) 790-2019Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) LT000926/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic enhancers are key transcriptional regulators which, upon the binding of sequence-specific transcription factors, activate their cognate target promoters. Although enhancers have been extensively studied in isolation, a substantial number of genes have more than one simultaneously active enhancer, and it remains unclear how these cooperate to regulate transcription. Using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model, we assay the activities of more than a thousand individual enhancers and about a million enhancer pairs toward housekeeping and developmental core promoters with STARR-seq. We report that housekeeping and developmental enhancers show distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity: while housekeeping enhancers are additive such that their combined activity mirrors the sum of their individual activities, developmental enhancers are super-additive and combine multiplicatively. Super-additivity between developmental enhancers is promiscuous and neither depends on the enhancers' endogenous genomic contexts nor on specific transcription factor motif signatures. However, it can be further boosted by Twist and Trl motifs and saturates for the highest levels of enhancer activity. These results have important implications for our understanding of gene regulation in complex multi-enhancer developmental loci and genomically clustered housekeeping genes, providing a rationale to interpret the transcriptional impact of non-coding mutations at different loci.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription FactorsAnimalsCell LineDNA-Binding ProteinsGenes, EssentialTranscription, GeneticTwist-Related Protein 1DNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsTranscription FactorsTrl protein, DrosophilaTwi protein, DrosophilaTwist-Related Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID39362902
PMCPMC11450171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.