Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39362701›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024

Differences in Cervical Spine Fractures in Patients Younger or Older Than 65 Years of Age: Implications for the Canadian C-Spine Rule.

Mahla Radmard, Armin Tafazolimoghadam, Shuchi Zinzuwadia, Akua Afrah Amoah, Arjun Chanmugam, David M Yousem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahla RadmardFrom the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (M.R., S.Z., D.M.Y.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland.
Armin TafazolimoghadamTehran University of Medical Sciences (A.T.), Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0009-0000-0641-1618
Shuchi ZinzuwadiaFrom the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (M.R., S.Z., D.M.Y.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6261-396X
Akua Afrah AmoahDepartment of Internal Medicine (A.A.A.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0009-0003-1754-3781
Arjun ChanmugamDepartment of Emergency Medicine (A.C.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland.
David M YousemFrom the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (M.R., S.Z., D.M.Y.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland dyousem1@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1222-6643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThere has been a distinction made in the 2001 Canadian C-Spine Rule regarding patients 65 and older and younger than 65 years of age as far as indications for cervical spine CT scanning. We sought to determine if there are differences in the symptoms, mechanisms of injury, fracture locations, and types that are still relevant in 2024. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe institutional review board approved this retrospective study of cervical spine CT emergency department results from 2 hospitals in our health system after reviewing 5 years of data in patients experiencing trauma. In addition to the primary variable of age (younger than 65 years and 65 years and older), we looked at injury mechanism, fracture types, sites, symptoms, and operative or medical treatments. Because the demographics of our home site is different from most towns in the United States, we provide race/ethnicity data.

resultsOf 21,986 cervical spine CTs, 190/9455 (2.0%) participants 65 years of age and older and 199/12,531 (1.6%) participants younger than 65 years of age had fractures (total, 389/21,986, 1.8%). There were more cases of falls from standing (106, 55.8%) and falls from a height (46, 4.2%) in those 65 years and older and this mechanism was associated with a higher risk of C1 and C2 fractures (52, 27.4%; and 78, 41.1%, respectively). Among the C1 fractures, anterior and posterior arch fractures predominated (37, 19.5%). For C2 fractures, types 2 and 3 odontoid fractures (39, 20.5%; and 12, 6.3%) were more common in the older cohort. Motor vehicle collisions were more common in the younger cohort (89, 44.7%), and they were associated with more C5-C7 fractures (47, 23.6%; 60, 30.2%; and 66, 33.2%, respectively) including the facets (49, 24.6%), spinous processes (31, 15.6%), and transverse processes (52, 26.1%). Overall, the rates of instability, surgical intervention, and asymptomatic fractures were similar in the 2 age groups.

conclusionsCervical spine fractures appear in about 1.8% of the CT scans performed in a busy emergency department environment. Fractures in the elderly occur more commonly due to falls, are located at C1 and C2, and may involve ligamentous injuries. Younger patients incur trauma more commonly due to motor vehicle collisions, and they are more likely to affect the posterior elements, especially C5-C7. The differences in trends for fractures in the 65 years of age and older and younger than 65 years of age groups have persisted since the Canadian C-Spine Rule 1996-1998 data were collected.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeSpinal FracturesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAge FactorsCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39362701
PMCPMC11543064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.