Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39362631›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics2025

State Differences in Children's Mental Health Care.

Genevieve Graaf, Phillip M Hughes, Kristin H Gigli, Neal A deJong, Robert E McGrath, Kathleen C Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Genevieve GraafSchool of Social Work (G Graaf), University of Texas at Arlington. Electronic address: genevieve.graaf@uta.edu.
Phillip M HughesDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (PM Hughes and KC Thomas), Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC; Division of Research (PM Hughes), UNC Health Sciences at MAHEC, Asheville, NC; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (PM Hughes and KC Thomas), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Kristin H GigliCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation (KH Gigli), University of Texas at Arlington.
Neal A deJongDepartment of Pediatrics (NA deJong), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Robert E McGrathSchool of Psychology and Counseling (RE McGrath), Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ.
Kathleen C ThomasDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (PM Hughes and KC Thomas), Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (PM Hughes and KC Thomas), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

Assessing the impacts of Medicaid Home and Community Based Waivers for children with Severe Emotional DisturbanceK01MH129991 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI GRAAF, GENEVIEVE · 2022 to 2025
$683k
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000032NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH129991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study estimates and compares variation in the probability of child unmet need for mental health care and difficulties accessing care for each state in the United States. Estimates are also generated and compared for three socioeconomic and demographic subgroups nationwide: racial and ethnic group, household income, and insurance type.

methodsUsing a retrospective, cross-sectional design, this study pooled 2016-2019 National Survey of Children's Health data. National, state, and subgroup adjusted probabilities of caregiver-reported child unmet need for mental health care and ease of access to mental health care were generated from logistic regression models with marginal post-estimation.

resultsAdjusted national probabilities of caregiver-reported child unmet mental health need and difficulty in accessing care were 0.21 and 0.46, respectively. State probabilities of unmet need ranged from 0.08 to 0.32. One state was significantly above the national estimate; nine states were below it. State probabilities of difficulty accessing mental health care ranged from 0.28 to 0.57; nine states' probabilities were significantly below the national estimate and two states were significantly above it. Estimates of unmet mental health need and difficulty accessing care varied more widely across states than across racial or ethnic groups, income groups, insurance groups.

conclusionsGeographic inequities in children's mental health care access persist; in some cases, they are larger than sociodemographic inequities.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandMental Health ServicesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthLogistic ModelsMaleRacial Groupsaccess to mental health carechild mental healthgeographic disparitiesunmet mental health care need

Identifiers

PMID39362631
PMCPMC11897828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.