ArticleNeuroImage2024
Strength of activation and temporal dynamics of bioluminescent-optogenetics in response to systemic injections of the luciferin.
Article in NeuroImage, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BioLuminescent OptoGenetics ("BL-OG") is a chemogenetic method that can evoke optogenetic reactions in the brain non-invasively. In BL-OG, an enzyme that catalyzes a light producing reaction (i.e., a luciferase) is tethered to an optogenetic element that is activated in response to bioluminescent light. Bioluminescence is generated by injecting a chemical substrate (luciferin, e.g., h-Coelenterazine; h-CTZ) that is catalyzed by the luciferase. By directly injecting the luciferin into the brain, we show that bioluminescent light is proportional to spiking activity, and this relationship scales as a function of luciferin dosage. Here, we build on these previous observations by characterizing the temporal dynamics and dose response curves of bioluminescence generated by luminopsins (LMOs), a proxy of BL-OG effects, to intravenous (IV) injections of the luciferin. We imaged bioluminescence through a thinned skull of mice running on a wheel, while delivering h-CTZ via the tail vein with different dosage concentrations and injection rates. The data reveal a systematic relationship between strength of bioluminescence and h-CTZ dosage, with higher concentration generating stronger bioluminescence. We also found that bioluminescent activity occurs rapidly (< 60 s after IV injection) regardless of concentration dosage. However, as expected, the onset time of bioluminescence is delayed as the injection rate decreases. Notably, the strength and time decay of bioluminescence is invariant to the injection rate of h-CTZ. Taken together, these data show that BL-OG effects are highly consistent across injection parameters of h-CTZ, highlighting the reliability of BL-OG as a minimally invasive neuromodulation method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.