Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361901›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

High-sugar diet leads to loss of beneficial probiotics in housefly larvae guts.

Anna Voulgari-Kokota, Francesco Boatta, Ruud Rijkers, Bregje Wertheim, Leo W Beukeboom, Jacintha Ellers, Joana Falcao Salles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The BlowflyPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna Voulgari-KokotaGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, P.O. Box 11103, Groningen 9700 CC, The Netherlands.
Francesco BoattaAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Section Ecology and Evolution, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Ruud RijkersAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Section Ecology and Evolution, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Bregje WertheimGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, P.O. Box 11103, Groningen 9700 CC, The Netherlands.
Leo W BeukeboomGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, P.O. Box 11103, Groningen 9700 CC, The Netherlands.
Jacintha EllersLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen 6700 EH, The Netherlands.
Joana Falcao SallesGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, P.O. Box 11103, Groningen 9700 CC, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The housefly (Musca domestica) is a common insect species with only a few recurrent bacterial taxa in its gut microbiota, because the numerous microbial acquisition routes in its septic habitats can favor transient microbes. Here, we investigated the role of the diet on the microbiota and the developmental success of a housefly strain reared on three substrates. We used a control wheat bran-based substrate, and added clotted cream and sucrose to make a high-fat, and a high-sugar substrate, respectively. The conducted survey revealed that, in contrast to the high-fat diet, the high-sugar diet caused lower developmental success and less diverse microbiota, in which several lactobacilli were replaced with Weissella bacterial phylotypes. Cultures with sucrose as the sole carbon source confirmed that a Weissella confusa strain, isolated from larvae, could utilize sucrose more efficiently than other tested lactic acid bacteria; a result also supported by gene function prediction analysis. Enhancing the rearing substrate with Limosilactobacillus fermentum and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains, which were isolated from control larvae, could not only revert the negative effect of the high-sucrose diet on development, but also increase the gut bacterial diversity. In our study, we show that the microbiota shifts in response to the high-sucrose diet did not benefit the host, that showed lower developmental success. In contrast, high-sucrose favored specific components of the microbiota, that continued to be enriched even after multiple generations, outcompeting beneficial bacteria. Also, microbiome manipulation showed the potential of probiotics to rescue host performance and restore the microbiome.

Indexed as

BacteriaDietDietary SugarsHousefliesAnimalsBiodiversityDiet, High-FatGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLarvaProbioticsSucroseDietary SugarsSucrosehigh-sugar diethouseflymicrobiotaprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID39361901
PMCPMC11495414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.