ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research
Real-world uptake of an innovative pupil expander device for cataract surgery: Implementation lessons learnt.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cataract surgery in the eyes, where the pupil does not dilate despite using eye drops, is fraught with vision-threatening complications. About 11 per cent of eyes undergoing cataract surgery have non-dilating, small pupils. The increasing prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), hypertension, diabetes and medications used for the same are the contributing factors. The recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the use of miotic agents in the treatment of presbyopia will lead to a further rise in the number of non-dilating pupils. While pharmacological agents and other methods have been used, mechanical pupil expander devices are the only fail safe option. However, available devices had a steep learning curve and limitations which made them difficult to use, unpredictable and unsafe. With its patented single plane, hexagonal, notches and flanges design, the US FDA registered B-HEX Pupil Expander (Med Invent Devices Pvt. Ltd., India) overcame these limitations and fulfilled an unmet need. The B-HEX is machinable, rapidly produced, consistent, easy to use, safe, and affordable. Despite such advantages, implementation hurdles have restricted its availability to healthcare systems worldwide. Peer acceptance has been steadily growing, with the B-HEX becoming the market leader in India, as evidenced by numerous publications, videos and papers presented at international conferences and comments from opinion leaders endorsing its use. However, impractical regulatory requirements and resource constraints remain a great impediment to the global distribution of this novel invention. This has denied many patients the benefits of a superior and more affordable option. Though value continues to be added to the B-HEX by maintaining a strong intellectual property portfolio with internationally granted Patents and Trademark, increasing its user base, and garnering support from key opinion leaders, only a collaboration with the right partner will help scale up the global reach and make it a leader in the global market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.