Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361801›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research

Implementation research on registering cancer cases in primary health centres of Puducherry through community health workers.

Cincy Merin Varughese, Swaroop Kumar Sahu, Gunaseelan Karunanithi, R Duraisamy, G Sriramulu, Bitty Raghavan, Mahalakshmy Thulasingam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cincy Merin VarugheseDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Swaroop Kumar SahuDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Gunaseelan KarunanithiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
R DuraisamyDepartment of Health and Family Welfare Services, Directorate of Health and Family Welfare Services, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry, India.
G SriramuluNational Rural Health Mission, Directorate of Health and Family Welfare Services, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry, India.
Bitty RaghavanDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Mahalakshmy ThulasingamDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives Hospital-based cancer registry does not represent the true burden of cancer in the community. Initiating a Primary Health Centre (PHC)-based cancer registry may better estimate population-level data for cancer cases in an area. This study aimed to set up a system for facilitating a PHC-based cancer registry and to assess the registration status of cancer cases in various PHCs of Puducherry. The facilitating and limiting factors while setting up this registry were also assessed. Methods A quasi-experimental study with an embedded mixed-method design was conducted in 31 PHCs/Community Health Centres (CHCs) from March 2021 to November 2022. The interventions were implemented in all PHCs/CHCs of Puducherry with the involvement of the State Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD) cell. The line list of cancer cases from the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER) Hospital-based cancer registry was shared with all PHCs/CHCs. Sensitization sessions for all Community Health Workers (CHWs) were conducted, and feedback on cancer registration status was given to the State NCD cell. Focus group discussion (FGD)/Key informant interview (KII) was undertaken to understand strengths, challenges, and suggestions. The logic model was used to understand the various indicators while setting up this PHC-based cancer registry. Results Over a one-year intervention period, 1270 cancer cases were registered at Puducherry's PHCs/CHCs, 1203 (88%) from the shared list and 67(5%) from other facilities. However, only 53 per cent of the expected living cases were captured in the various PHCs. Major limitations for registration were the COVID-19 pandemic, stigma, inadequate manpower, infrastructure issues, and privacy concerns during screening. Interpretation & conclusions It was feasible to set up a PHC-based cancer registry in all PHCs of Puducherry. However, registration of cancer cases was suboptimal, as population-based screening of cancer cases, as recommended in the National Programme for Prevention & Control of Non-Communicable Diseases (NP-NCD) programme, was weak due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Once this is strengthened, the PHC-based cancer registry will better represent the population.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersNeoplasmsPrimary Health CareRegistriesCommunity Health CentersCOVID-19FemaleHumansIndiaMaleSARS-CoV-2Cancercommunity health workersimplementation researchPHC-based cancer registryPHC-primary health centrespopulation-based registry

Identifiers

PMID39361801
PMCPMC11413878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.