Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361800›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research

Prevention & management of snakebite envenomation: A qualitative study on perspectives & practices in Maharashtra & Odisha.

Hrishikesh Munshi, Millind Gavhande, Ganesh Bhad, Bijayalaxmi Mohanty, Jagdish Prasad Dash, Kanna Madavi, Manohar Bansode, Amarendra Mohapatra, Smita D Mahale, Sanghamitra Pati and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hrishikesh MunshiClinical Research Laboratory, Mumbai, India.
Millind GavhandeClinical Research Laboratory, Mumbai, India.
Ganesh BhadClinical Research Laboratory, Mumbai, India.
Bijayalaxmi MohantyEpidemiology Division, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Jagdish Prasad DashEpidemiology Division, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Kanna MadaviSub District Hospital Aheri, Government of Maharashtra, Maharashtra, India.
Manohar BansodeSub District Hospital Shahapur, Government of Maharashtra, Maharashtra, India.
Amarendra MohapatraEpidemiology Division, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Smita D MahaleFormerly, Mumbai, India.
Sanghamitra PatiICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Geetanjali SachdevaICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.
Himmatrao S BawaskarBawaskar Hospital and Clinical Research Centre, Raigad, Maharashtra, India.
Rahul GajbhiyeClinical Research Laboratory, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives Snakebite envenoming (SBE) is a major public health concern, with India bearing the highest global burden of SBE-related deaths. SBE is concentrated in rural and tribal regions of India, where the knowledge, attitude and behaviour of the dwelling communities largely influence mortality and morbidity. Understanding these factors is crucial to designing effective SBE prevention and management strategies. The present study's objective was to document the perspectives of community members and practices in selected blocks of Maharashtra and Odisha States regarding SBE prevention, first aid and health-seeking behaviour. Methods Between March and April 2022, 28 focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted. Study sites included Shahapur block in Thane district, Aheri block in Gadchiroli district of Maharashtra, and Khordha block in Khordha district, Kasipur block in Rayagada district of Odisha. Separate FGDs were held for males (n=14) and females (n=14), involving about 8-16 participants above 18 yr. All discussions were audio recorded, and a grounded theory approach was employed to identify key themes from the translated transcripts. Results The findings of this study revealed a variety of perspectives and practices determining the SBE burden at the study sites. The findings included insufficient knowledge about snake species and their nature of toxicity, use of non-scientific first aid techniques, inaccessible health care and reliance on traditional healers, non-utilization of prevention methods, varied cultural beliefs and practices, and differential treatments based on gender. The findings have been collated in two simplistic frameworks; barriers to effective prevention and barriers to effective management. Interpretation & conclusions SBE burden results from a complex interplay between socioeconomic, cultural, and demographic factors, necessitating a collaborative inter-sectoral effort for adequate control. Through crucial regional inputs and the barriers to prevention and management models, this study provides critical insights and priority intervention areas to strengthen India's upcoming National Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Snakebite Envenoming (NAPSE) in all high-burden States.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSnake BitesAdolescentAdultAnimalsAntiveninsFemaleFirst AidFocus GroupsHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRural PopulationAntiveninsattitude and practicesEnvenomationfocus group discussionIndiaknowledgemorbiditymortalitysnakebites

Identifiers

PMID39361800
PMCPMC11414789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.