Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361796›Full record

ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research

Current status of implementation of trauma registries' in LMICs & facilitators to implementation barriers: A literature review & consultation.

Maria P Cote, Radzi Hamzah, Isaac G Alty, Isita Tripathi, Adriana Montalvan, Sophia M Leonard, Jyoti Kamble, Saad Javed, Sabrina Asturias, Monty Khajanchi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Indian journal of medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria P CoteDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Radzi HamzahProgramme in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Isaac G AltyProgramme in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Isita TripathiProgramme in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Adriana MontalvanDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sophia M LeonardDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jyoti KambleDepartment of Public Health, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Saad JavedHealth Services Academy, Ministry of National Health Services Regulations & Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sabrina AsturiasDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Roosevelt Hospital, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Monty KhajanchiSeth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Nakul P RaykarProgramme in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives Many low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) have attempted to implement trauma registries with varying degrees of success. This study aimed to understand the registry implementation mechanism in LMICs better. Study objectives include assessment of the current use of trauma registries in LMICs, identification of barriers to the process and potential areas for intervention, and investigation of the registry implementation experience of key stakeholders in LMICs. Methods An initial narrative review of articles on trauma registry use in LMICs published in English between January 2017 and September 2023 was conducted. Key findings identified in this review were used to establish a theoretical framework from which an interview guide was subsequently developed. Expert consultation with key stakeholders in trauma registry implementation in two LMICs was conducted to assess the experience of registry implementation further. Results The presence of trauma registries in LMICs is limited. Key implementation barriers include funding concerns, uncoordinated administrative efforts, lack of human and physical resources (i.e., technology, equipment), and challenges in data management, analysis, and quality. Stakeholder interviews highlighted the importance of trauma registry development but echoed some obstacles, notably funding and data collection barriers. Interpretation & conclusions Barriers to registry implementation are ubiquitous and may contribute to the low uptake of registries in LMICs. One potential solution to these challenges is the application of the WHO International Registry for Trauma and Emergency Care. Future studies examining context-specific challenges to registry implementation and sustained utilization are required.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesRegistriesWounds and InjuriesHumansImplementationinjury surveillanceLMIC–low- and middle- income countriestraumatrauma systems

Identifiers

PMID39361796
PMCPMC11413881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.