Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361794›Full record

ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research

Resuscitation following trauma & role of trauma training programmes in emergency settings: A literature review & survey.

Priyansh Nathani, Niyara Seit-Yagyayeva, Deepa Kizhakke Veetil, Himanshu Iyer, Debojit Basak, Isaac G Alty, Shamita Chatterjee, Nakul P Raykar, Nobhojit Roy, Stuti Bhargava and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Indian journal of medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Endovascular Localization of Aortic Injury in a Porcine Model.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Priyansh NathaniWHO Collaborating Center for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in Low and Middle-Income Countries, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Niyara Seit-YagyayevaWHO Collaborating Center for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in Low and Middle-Income Countries, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Deepa Kizhakke VeetilWHO Collaborating Center for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in Low and Middle-Income Countries, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Himanshu IyerWHO Collaborating Center for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in Low and Middle-Income Countries, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Debojit BasakInstitute of Post-Graduate Medical Education & Research, Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital, Kolkata, India.
Isaac G AltyProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Shamita ChatterjeeInstitute of Post-Graduate Medical Education & Research, Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital, Kolkata, India.
Nakul P RaykarProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Nobhojit RoyThe George Institute of Global Health, New Delhi, India.
Stuti BhargavaDivision of Development Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Bhakti SarangWHO Collaborating Center for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in Low and Middle-Income Countries, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives Traumatic injuries, especially in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), present significant challenges in patient resuscitation and healthcare delivery. This study explores the role of trauma training programmes in improving patient outcomes and reducing preventable trauma-related deaths. Methods A dual approach was adopted, first a literature review of trauma training in LMICs over the past decade, along with a situational assessment survey. For the review of literature, we searched the PubMed database to identify key challenges and innovative practices in trauma training programmes in LMIC's. The survey, conducted among healthcare professionals in various LMICs, collected direct insights into the challenges and the status of trauma training programmes in these countries. Results The literature review analysed 68 articles, with a significant focus on the African subcontinent (36 studies), underscoring the region's emphasis on research on trauma training programmes. These studies mainly targeted physicians, clinicians, postgraduate trainees in surgical or anaesthesia fields and medical students (86.8%), highlighting innovations like simulation-based training and the cascading training model. In our survey, we received 34 responses from healthcare professionals in India, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Nepal and Pakistan. Around 52.9 per cent reported the absence of established trauma training programmes in their settings. The majority of respondents advocated for hands-on, simulation-based training (94.1%) and emphasised the need for structured training programmes (85.3%), feedback sessions (70.6%) and updated protocols (61.8%). This combined data underlined the critical gaps and potential improvements in trauma training programmes and resuscitation practices in LMICs. Interpretation & conclusions Effective trauma care in LMICs requires the establishment of comprehensive, tailored training programmes. Key interventions should include subsidization of pre-existing trauma courses and the adoption of World Health Organization Guidelines for essential trauma care, implementation of trauma quality improvement and review processes and the incorporation of focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) in emergency departments. These steps are crucial for equipping healthcare workers with vital skills and knowledge, fostering a culture of continuous learning and improvement in the realm of trauma care.

Indexed as

ResuscitationWounds and InjuriesDeveloping CountriesHealth PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesEmergencyFASTLMICsimulation-based trainingtrauma resuscitationtrauma training

Identifiers

PMID39361794
PMCPMC11413882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.