ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Conducting tobacco control surveys among schoolchildren in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: A feasibility study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Conducting tobacco control surveys among schoolchildren in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: A feasibility study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most of the world's 300 million smokeless tobacco (ST) users live in South Asia but ST policies for that region are poorly researched, developed and implemented. Longitudinal studies to understand the uptake and use of ST and smoking, and influences on these, such as health promotion strategies, are lacking. We planned to conduct longitudinal surveys among secondary school students in three countries with the highest ST burden: Bangladesh, India and Pakistan to explore ST and smoking uptake, use and health promoting strategies. Before running that longitudinal study, we assessed the feasibility of conducting such a multi country survey using a mixed-methods design. The survey (and feasibility study) was conducted in 24 secondary schools (eight per country, three classes per school). Three data sources, researcher records/fieldnotes, survey data of 1179 students, and interview/focus group discussion data from 24 headteachers, 64 teachers and 76 students, were used to understand the feasibility of three study tasks: 1) selecting, recruiting, and retaining schools and student participants; 2) survey administration; and 3) robustness of the data collection instruments. The datasets were analysed separately and triangulated. Overall, we could select and recruit schools and students using consistent methods across countries although recruitment was challenged by securing higher authority permissions and parental consent. Recommended improvements were for permission/consent processes. Survey administration was generally feasible and acceptable with recommendations for scheduling and researcher-student ratios. Questionnaire completion was 83%-100% across countries, with suggestions to improve readability and understanding, addressing students' queries and questionnaire simplification. Due to COVID-19, we could not conduct follow-up surveys, so were unable to assess school or student retention. In conclusion, incorporating the lessons learnt from this study would improve the feasibility of conducting such a multi-country survey in the future. Reported benefits included increasing tobacco health risks' knowledge with potential for increased tobacco control support.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.