Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361597›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Performance and usability of cardiometabolic point of care devices in Nepal: A prospective, quantitative, accuracy study.

Marina Giachino, Beatrice Vetter, Sigiriya Aebischer Perone, Jorge César Correia, Berra Erkosar, Olivia Heller, Vijay Kumar Khanal, Bruno Lab, Zoltan Pataky, Sagar Poudel and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05257564 (Performance and Usability Evaluation of Cardiometabolic Point-of-care Devices in a Target Use Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05257564 nacompletednot on this map

Performance and Usability Evaluation of Cardiometabolic Point-of-care Devices in a Target Use Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, SwitzerlandRan2022 to 2022Enrolled359ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Diseases, HyperlipidemiasArmsDetermine the accuracy of quantitative measurements of GLU, HbA1c,CHOL and CRE with POC devices compared to a laboratory reference method (Roche)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Bridging the diagnostic gap in diabetes.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marina GiachinoDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0797-3318
Beatrice VetterFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7898-472X
Sigiriya Aebischer PeroneDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jorge César CorreiaDivision of Endocrinology, Unit of Therapeutic Patient Education, WHO Collaborating Centre, Diabetology, Nutrition and Therapeutic Patient Education, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7020-0695
Berra ErkosarFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1152-6772
Olivia HellerDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7090-1365
Vijay Kumar KhanalB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7883-9568
Bruno LabDivision of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Zoltan PatakyDivision of Endocrinology, Unit of Therapeutic Patient Education, WHO Collaborating Centre, Diabetology, Nutrition and Therapeutic Patient Education, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8720-3833
Sagar PoudelAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0021-897X
Mamit RaiProgram for Early Detection and Management of Kidney Hypertension Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases (KHDC), Dharan, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1423-4778
Sanjib Kumar SharmaB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8392-8028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, represent a serious global health concern. There is an urgent need for prompt diagnosis and effective monitoring at point of care, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Here we present the results of a study assessing the quantitative accuracy of two devices that may fit the target product profile for a cardiometabolic point-of-care device. This prospective, quantitative, accuracy study (NCT05257564) was conducted between March to May 2022, investigating the performance of the JanaCare Aina Blood Monitoring System (JCAina) and the Tascom SimplexTAS 101 device (TAS101) compared with local standard laboratory methods in rural Nepal. Using fingerstick capillary blood, cardiometabolic parameters were analysed using both devices. The quantitative accuracy was compared against a local laboratory reference assay. System usability was also assessed. For JCAina, the mean absolute biases (Bland-Altman analysis) for glucose, HbA1c and total cholesterol tests were -3.87 mg/dL (95% CI: -7.52--0.22), 1.34% (95% CI: 1.21-1.47), and -9.52 mg/dL (95% CI: -11.9--7.2), respectively, corresponding to mean percentage biases of 2.0%, 18.5%, and -6.4%. These indicate clinically small (<10% biases) differences from laboratory results for glucose and cholesterol, and a moderate (10-20%) positive bias for HbA1c. For TAS101, the mean absolute biases for glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol and creatinine tests were 18.7 mg/dL (95% CI: 15.8-21.5), -0.2% (95% CI: -0.26--0.14), 29.8 mg/dL (95% CI: 27.0-32.6), and -0.02 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.05-0.01), respectively, corresponding to mean percentage biases of 12.1%, -2.6%, 15.8%, and -4.5%. These indicate clinically small differences for HbA1c and creatinine, and moderate positive biases for glucose and cholesterol. Both systems exhibited usability challenges. The JCAina and TAS101 point-of-care cardiometabolic devices were shown to have promising accuracy in environmental conditions such as in Nepal, though improvements are still needed for some parameters and for ease of use. Trial registration: NCT05257564 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Identifiers

PMID39361597
PMCPMC11449279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.