ArticlePloS one2024
The box office prediction model based on the optimized XGBoost algorithm in the context of film marketing and distribution.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve the accuracy and efficiency of box office prediction, this study deeply discusses the application of the optimized eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model in this scenario and its advantages compared with other commonly used machine learning models. By comparing and analyzing five models, involving the Deep Neural Network, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, and CatBoost, several key performance indicators such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, generalization error, stability, robustness, and adaptability score are comprehensively investigated. The research results reveal that the optimization model proposed in this study is superior to the comparison model in most evaluation indicators, especially when the data volume reaches 2500, showing obvious advantages. For example, the accuracy is increased to 0.9, the F1 score is 0.9, the generalization error is reduced to 0.09, and the stability score is as high as 0.98. The robustness and adaptability scores are both 0.97, which proves its strong prediction ability and high stability and robustness on large-scale datasets. Therefore, this study provides scientific data support and a decision-making basis for the film industry in the formulation of marketing and distribution strategies. Moreover, film producers and distributors can reasonably estimate their market performance early in film shooting, optimize investment decisions, and reduce economic risks through accurate box office predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.