ArticlePloS one2024
Design of image segmentation model based on residual connection and feature fusion.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An automated detection system of autism spectrum disorder using meta-heuristic approach of adaptive LSTM with bayesian learning technique.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of deep learning technology, convolutional neural networks have made great progress in the field of image segmentation. However, for complex scenes and multi-scale target images, the existing technologies are still unable to achieve effective image segmentation. In view of this, an image segmentation model based on residual connection and feature fusion is proposed. The model makes comprehensive use of the deep feature extraction ability of residual connections and the multi-scale feature integration ability of feature fusion. In order to solve the problem of background complexity and information loss in traditional image segmentation, experiments were carried out on two publicly available data sets. The results showed that in the ISPRS Vaihingen dataset and the Caltech UCSD Birds200 dataset, when the model completed the 56th and 84th iterations, respectively, the average accuracy of FRes-MFDNN was the highest, which was 97.89% and 98.24%, respectively. In the ISPRS Vaihingen dataset and the Caltech UCSD Birds200 dataset, when the system model ran to 0.20s and 0.26s, the F1 value of the FRes-MFDNN method was the largest, and the F1 value approached 100% infinitely. The FRes-MFDNN segmented four images in the ISPRS Vaihingen dataset, and the segmentation accuracy of images 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 91.44%, 92.12%, 94.02% and 91.41%, respectively. In practical applications, the MSRF-Net method, LBN-AA-SPN method, ARG-Otsu method, and FRes-MFDNN were used to segment unlabeled bird images. The results showed that the FRes-MFDNN was more complete in details, and the overall effect was significantly better than the other three models. Meanwhile, in ordinary scene images, although there was a certain degree of noise and occlusion, the model still accurately recognized and segmented the main bird images. The results show that compared with the traditional model, after FRes-MFDNN segmentation, the completeness, detail, and spatial continuity of pixels have been significantly improved, making it more suitable for complex scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.