Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361567›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The experiences and decision making of patients with incurable cancer and health literacy difficulties.

Chloe E Holden, Richard Wagland, Amélie Harle, Sally Wheelwright

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07450950 (Evaluating Health Literacy, Expectations and Regrets in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery for Malignant Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07450950 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Health Literacy, Expectations and Regrets in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery for Malignant Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2025 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsSurgery, Major Pancreatic, Surgery, Major Hepatic, Large Bowel/Sarcoma Resections, Surgery, Major Esophageal or Stomach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chloe E HoldenDorset Cancer Centre, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4656-101X
Richard WaglandHealth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Amélie HarleDorset Cancer Centre, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom.
Sally WheelwrightSussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveShared decision making is important when decisions are preference sensitive, as in incurable cancer. A prerequisite for shared decision making is health literacy, which is essential to facilitate good understanding of an individual's current situation, the decision to be made, and the options available to them. This study sought to learn about the challenges for shared decision making faced by patients with incurable cancer and health literacy difficulties.

methodsSemi-structured telephone and video interviews were used to collect data on participants' experiences, decision making, and challenges faced. Study procedures followed health literacy principles, with information offered in various formats to suit individuals' preferences, the use of a verbal consent process, and flexibility in whether interviews were conducted over telephone or video call. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis (Ritchie et al. 2003), with initial verbatim transcription of interviews, iterative development of the analysis framework, indexing using Nvivo 12 software and summarising of the data before systematic categorisation and development of final themes.

resultsTwenty participants (aged 31-80, of whom 13 male) with a variety of cancers (including breast, central nervous system, gastrointestinal, gynaecological, lung, head and neck, and urological) and experience of a range of treatments were interviewed. Seven themes were identified, including: supportive staff in an imperfect system, additional pressure from COVID-19, in the expert's hands, treatment not so bad, emotional hurdles, accessing information to further understanding and wanting to be a good patient.

conclusionIn order to support patients with incurable cancer and health literacy difficulties to become involved in decisions about their care, we must address the emotional, social and informational challenges they face. Recommendations for achieving this include addressing peoples' emotional needs, facilitating control over information, developing a partnership, involving others, and organisational changes.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyNeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19Decision MakingDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39361567
PMCPMC11449316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.