Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361368›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2025

The temporal dynamics of visual attention.

Han Zhang, Jacob Sellers, Taraz G Lee, John Jonides

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Signal suppression makes search less effortful.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Rapid Inversion of Singleton Distractor Representations Underlies Learned Attentional Suppression.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Distractor avoidance and early quitting in visual search.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: Foundations and emerging issues.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2025
    Review
  14. The temporal dynamics of visual attention.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Han ZhangDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-6087-0428
Jacob SellersDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan.
Taraz G LeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-3186-8625
John JonidesDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan.

Funding

Investigating interference-control in ADHD using a novel forced-response methodR21MH129909 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JONIDES, JOHN · 2023 to 2024
$429k
National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental HealthNational Science FoundationNIMH NIH HHS R21 MH129909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers have long debated how humans select relevant objects amid physically salient distractions. An increasingly popular view holds that the key to avoiding distractions lies in suppressing the attentional priority of a salient distractor. However, the precise mechanisms of distractor suppression remain elusive. Because the computation of attentional priority is a time-dependent process, distractor suppression must be understood within these temporal dynamics. In four experiments, we tracked the temporal dynamics of visual attention using a novel forced-response method, by which participants were required to express their latent attentional priority at varying processing times via saccades. We show that attention could be biased either toward or away from a salient distractor depending on the timing of observation, with these temporal dynamics varying substantially across experiments. These dynamics were explained by a computational model assuming the distractor and target priority signals arrive asynchronously in time and with different influences on saccadic behavior. The model suggests that distractor signal suppression can be achieved via a "slow" mechanism in which the distractor priority signal dictates saccadic behavior until a late-arriving priority signal overrides it, or a "fast" mechanism which directly suppresses the distractor priority signal's behavioral expression. The two mechanisms are temporally dissociable and can work collaboratively, resulting in time-dependent patterns of attentional allocation. The current work underscores the importance of considering the temporal dynamics of visual attention and provides a computational architecture for understanding the mechanisms of distractor suppression. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AttentionSaccadesVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39361368
PMCPMC11790386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.