Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361355›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2024

Robust and automatic beamstop shadow outlier rejection: combining crystallographic statistics with modern clustering under a semi-supervised learning strategy.

Yunyun Gao, Helen M Ginn, Andrea Thorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yunyun GaoInsitut für Nanostruktur und Festkörperphysik, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7220-2638
Helen M GinnInsitut für Nanostruktur und Festkörperphysik, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7894-4939
Andrea ThornInsitut für Nanostruktur und Festkörperphysik, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4503-4258

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 05K19WWABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 05K22GU5Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TH2135/2-1Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft VH-NG-19-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the automatic processing of crystallographic diffraction experiments, beamstop shadows are often unaccounted for or only partially masked. As a result of this, outlier reflection intensities are integrated, which is a known issue. Traditional statistical diagnostics have only limited effectiveness in identifying these outliers, here termed Not-Excluded-unMasked-Outliers (NEMOs). The diagnostic tool AUSPEX allows visual inspection of NEMOs, where they form a typical pattern: clusters at the low-resolution end of the AUSPEX plots of intensities or amplitudes versus resolution. To automate NEMO detection, a new algorithm was developed by combining data statistics with a density-based clustering method. This approach demonstrates a promising performance in detecting NEMOs in merged data sets without disrupting existing data-reduction pipelines. Re-refinement results indicate that excluding the identified NEMOs can effectively enhance the quality of subsequent structure-determination steps. This method offers a prospective automated means to assess the efficacy of a beamstop mask, as well as highlighting the potential of modern pattern-recognition techniques for automating outlier exclusion during data processing, facilitating future adaptation to evolving experimental strategies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisCrystallography, X-RaySupervised Machine LearningAUSPEXclusteringoutlierssemi-supervised learningstatisticsX-ray crystallography

Identifiers

PMID39361355
PMCPMC11448920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.