ArticleJAMA network open2024
USPSTF Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendation and Uptake for Individuals Aged 45 to 49 Years.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prophylactic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Platinum Agents Following Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- A screening-threshold-oriented framework reveals threshold-adjacent redistribution of global colorectal cancer burden: an analysis of GBD 2023.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Estimating the carcinogenesis timelines in early-onset versus late-onset cancers and changes across birth cohorts.Science advances · 2026Article
- The rapid surge of colorectal cancer in children and young adults: a 22-year analysis of the CDC WONDER database.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
- Article
- Rethinking Colorectal Cancer Screening: Culturally Tailored Navigation for Mailed FIT Kits in 45- to 49-Year-Olds.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Association Between Patient-Provider Relationship Quality and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among US Adults.Cureus · 2026Article
- Unmet social needs and colorectal cancer testing at 45-49 since the 2021 USPSTF recommendation.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Article
- Barriers and enablers for health system reform.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Review
- Rural-urban disparities in colorectal cancer screening in United States: Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis of BRFSS data.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Characterizing racial disparities in follow-up care after open-access colonoscopy.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2025Article
- Facility-Based Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in 45- to 49-Year-Olds After US Guideline Changes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Review
- Changes in Colorectal Cancer Screening Modalities Among Insured Individuals.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Estimating the carcinogenesis timelines in early-onset versus late-onset cancers and changes across birth cohorts.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- When Should Colon Cancer Screening Begin? The Impact of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer and the Reality of an Unscreened Older Population.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Review
- Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Before and After the Onset of the COVID Pandemic.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Epidemiological trends in gastrointestinal cancers and risk factors across U.S. states from 2000 to 2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: In May 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued a grade B recommendation encouraging colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among average-risk individuals aged 45 to 49 years. The patterns of screening uptake and possible socioeconomic disparities in screening in this age group remain unknown. Objective: To evaluate changes in CRC screening uptake among average-risk individuals aged 45 to 49 years after the USPSTF recommendation was issued in 2021. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used deidentified claims data from commercially insured Blue Cross Blue Shield beneficiaries aged 45 to 49 years across the US between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. Exposure: Publication of the May 2021 USPSTF CRC screening recommendation for adults aged 45 to 49 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Absolute and relative changes in screening uptake were compared between a 20-month period preceding (May 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019) and a 20-month period following (May 1, 2021, to December, 31, 2022) the USPSTF recommendation. Interrupted time-series analysis and autoregressive integrated moving average models were used to evaluate changes in screening rates, adjusting for temporal autocorrelation and seasonality. Results: In this cohort study of 10 221 114 distinct beneficiaries aged 45 to 49 years (mean [SD] age, 47.04 [1.41] years; 51.04% female), bimonthly mean (SD) numbers of average-risk beneficiaries were 3 213 935 (31 508) and 2 923 327 (105 716) in the prerecommendation and postrecommendation periods, respectively. Mean (SD) screening uptake increased from 0.50% (0.02%) to 1.51% (0.59%) between the 2 periods (P < .001), representing an absolute change of 1.01 percentage points (95% CI, 0.62-1.40 percentage points) but no significant relative change (202.51%; 95% CI, -30.59% to 436.87%). Compared with average-risk beneficiaries residing in areas with the lowest socioeconomic status (SES), those residing in areas with the highest SES experienced the largest absolute change in screening (1.25 [95% CI, 0.77-1.74] percentage points vs 0.75 [95% CI, 0.47-1.02] percentage points), but relative changes were not significant (214.01% [95% CI, -30.91% to 461.15%] vs 167.73% [95% CI, -16.30% to 352.62%]). After the recommendation was issued, the screening uptake rate also increased fastest among average-risk beneficiaries residing in the areas with highest SES (0.24 [95% CI, 0.23-0.25] percentage points every 2 months) and metropolitan areas (0.20 [95% CI, 0.19-0.21] percentage points every 2 months). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that among privately insured beneficiaries aged 45 to 49 years, CRC screening uptake increased after the USPSTF recommendation, with potential disparities based on SES and locality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.