Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361273›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2024

The dichoptic contrast ordering test: A method for measuring the depth of binocular imbalance.

Alex S Baldwin, Marie-Céline Lorenzini, Annabel Wing-Yan Fan, Robert F Hess, Alexandre Reynaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex S BaldwinMcGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill University; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marie-Céline LorenziniMcGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill University; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Annabel Wing-Yan FanMcGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill University; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Robert F HessMcGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill University; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alexandre ReynaudMcGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill University; McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In binocular vision, the relative strength of the input from the two eyes can have significant functional impact. These inputs are typically balanced; however, in some conditions (e.g., amblyopia), one eye will dominate over the other. To quantify imbalances in binocular vision, we have developed the Dichoptic Contrast Ordering Test (DiCOT). Implemented on a tablet device, the program uses rankings of perceived contrast (of dichoptically presented stimuli) to find a scaling factor that balances the two eyes. We measured how physical interventions (applied to one eye) affect the DiCOT measurements, including neutral density (ND) filters, Bangerter filters, and optical blur introduced by a +3-diopter (D) lens. The DiCOT results were compared to those from the Dichoptic Letter Test (DLT). Both the DiCOT and the DLT showed excellent test-retest reliability; however, the magnitude of the imbalances introduced by the interventions was greater in the DLT. To find consistency between the methods, rescaling the DiCOT results from individual conditions gave good results. However, the adjustments required for the +3-D lens condition were quite different from those for the ND and Bangerter filters. Our results indicate that the DiCOT and DLT measures partially separate aspects of binocular imbalance. This supports the simultaneous use of both measures in future studies.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityVision, BinocularVision TestsAdultAmblyopiaDepth PerceptionFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39361273
PMCPMC11460568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.