Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361203›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024

Pilot study on neonicotinoids in Finnish waterbirds: no detectable concentrations in common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula) plasma.

Amalie V Ask, Pilar Gómez-Ramírez, Veerle L B Jaspers, José Fenoll, Juana Cava, Farshad S Vakili, Prescillia Lemesle, Tapio Eeva, Aurélie Davranche, Sanna Koivisto and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amalie V AskDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland. amalie.ask@utu.fi.
Pilar Gómez-RamírezArea of Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Campus Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Veerle L B JaspersDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
José FenollInstituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario, IMIDA, 30150, Murcia, Spain.
Juana CavaInstituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario, IMIDA, 30150, Murcia, Spain.
Farshad S VakiliDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Prescillia LemesleDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Tapio EevaDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Aurélie DavrancheLammi Biological Station, University of Helsinki, 16900, Lammi, Finland.
Sanna KoivistoFinnish Safety and Chemicals Agency, P.O. Box 66, 00521, Helsinki, Finland.
Martin HansenDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Céline ArzelDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, 20014, Turku, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 333400Academy of Finland 336261Academy of Finland SA338180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonicotinoids have been detected in farmland-associated birds and exposure to these insecticides has been linked to adverse effects. Even though neonicotinoids are mobile and persistent and have been detected in surface waters and aquatic invertebrates, there is a considerable lack of knowledge on their occurrence in waterbirds. Here we investigated the occurrence of seven neonicotinoids and some of their transformation products (imidacloprid, thiacloprid, thiamethoxam, acetamiprid, clothianidin, dinotefuran, nitenpyram, 6-chloronicotinic acid, hydroxy-imidacloprid, imidacloprid-urea, imidacloprid-olefin, thiamethoxam-urea, thiacloprid-amide, acetamiprid-acetate, and acetamiprid-desmethyl) in blood plasma of 51 incubating female common goldeneyes (Bucephala clangula). We collected samples from five different regions from southern to northern Finland encompassing rural and urban settings in coastal and inland areas. Surprisingly, none of the targeted neonicotinoids was found above the limit of detection in any of the samples. As neonicotinoid concentrations in wild birds can be very low, a likely reason for the nil results is that the LODs were too high; this and other possible reasons for the lack of detection of neonicotinoids in the goldeneyes are discussed. Our results suggest that neonicotinoid exposure in their breeding areas is currently not of major concern to female goldeneyes in Finland. Even though this study did not find any immediate danger of neonicotinoids to goldeneyes, further studies including surface water, aquatic invertebrates, and other bird species could elucidate potential indirect food chain effects.

Indexed as

NeonicotinoidsAnimalsBirdsEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleFinlandInsecticidesNitro CompoundsPilot ProjectsInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsBiocideBiomonitoringDuckPlant protection productPlasmaVeterinary medicine

Identifiers

PMID39361203
PMCPMC11541392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.