Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39361176›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Survival Analysis of Conversion Surgery in Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Addressing Selection and Immortal Time Bias: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Ryota Ito, Ryuji Yoshioka, Naotake Yanagisawa, Shigeto Ishii, Jun Sugitani, Ryoji Furuya, Masahiro Fujisawa, Hiroshi Imamura, Yoshihiro Mise, Hiroyuki Isayama and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ryota ItoDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryuji YoshiokaDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Naotake YanagisawaMedical Technology Innovation Centre, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeto IshiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun SugitaniDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryoji FuruyaDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro FujisawaDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi ImamuraDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro MiseDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki IsayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akio SaiuraDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. a-saiura@juntendo.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to provide a detailed evaluation of the oncological advantages of surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with borderline resectable (BR) or unresectable (UR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a focus on minimizing biases. Recently, NAC has become the standard care for BR or UR locally advanced (UR-LA) PDAC, however, many studies have assessed survival benefits and favorable variables without consideration for biases, particularly immortal time bias. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study included patients diagnosed with BR or UR-LA PDAC at Juntendo University Hospital from 2019 to 2022. To mitigate bias, we applied methods such as propensity score matching (PSM), time-dependent covariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (TDC), landmark analysis, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model.

resultsThe study analyzed 124 patients, dividing them into a surgery group (n = 57) and a chemotherapy-only group (n = 67). After PSM, there were 21 matched pairs. Survival analysis using TDC analysis showed that the surgery group had significantly better overall survival compared with the chemotherapy-only group in both the entire cohort and the matched pairs. Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort also revealed a similar superiority of surgery, while the landmark analysis showed varying results depending on the landmark setting.

conclusionsAfter careful adjustment for selection and immortal time biases, surgery following NAC appears to significantly extend survival in patients with BR or UR PDAC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalNeoadjuvant TherapyPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateBorderline resectableImmortal time biasPancreatic cancerPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaSelection biasUnresectable locally advanced

Identifiers

PMID39361176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.